In March 2008, we updated all data for the 59 countries surveyed with official figures, sourced fromcentral banks and regulators. In most cases, we were able to find data that pertained to the end of 2007: inalmost all other cases, the data pertains to September 30 2007. As a result, the insights that we derive onparticular countries are based on consistently sourced information that is far more current than it had beenpreviously.
Although we gather data for countries such as the US, Japan, Australia and the eurozone, the vastmajority of the 59 countries whose banking industries we survey are, or are generally seen as being,emerging markets. For all the widely publicised problems of large banks in developed countries, in thewake of the subprime banking crisis in the US, 2007 was an extremely good year for the banking sectorsof the emerging markets. In local currency terms, the median growth in assets was 21% (in Brazil). Themedian rates of growth in loans to non-bank customers and in deposits were 22% (in India) and 18% (inMorocco). In some countries - and not just those enjoying oil booms - the figures were spectacular. InUkraine, for instance, assets and deposits rose by 76% and 62% respectively. Loans grew by more thanone-third in Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovenia, Peru, Bahrain, Iranand Nigeria. Deposits also rose by more than one-third in most of these countries.
In absolute terms, the Philippines’ banking sector grew little through the year to June 30 2007. In localcurrency terms, total assets, total loans and total deposits increased by 10%, 8% and 14% respectively.The loan/deposit and loan/asset ratio’s fell, while the loan/GDP ratio rose.
Of the 59 countries surveyed the Philippines ranks 49th in terms of local currency asset growth, 55th interms of local currency loan growth and 38th in terms of local currency deposit growth. All three of theserankings are relatively low. The Philippines’ rankings in terms of its loan/deposit, loan/asset andloan/GDP ratios are 52nd, 44th and 44th, respectively. In a country with per capita GDP of justUS$1,640, deposits per capita are as high as US$1,017.
In Q108, we envisaged that total assets, total loans and total deposits would rise by 8%, 2% and 8%annually through the 2007-2012 forecast period. Now, and using an improved forecasting method, we arelooking for slightly higher growth rates of 10%, 10% and 12% respectively.
Since Q108, we have calculated, on a consistent basis, a Commercial Bank Business Environment Rating(CBBER) for each of the 59 countries surveyed. The CBBER includes an assessment of the limits ofpotential returns: it does this by taking into account the size, growth potential and bancassurancepotential of the banking sector, as well as aspects of the economy in 2007. The CBBER also depends onan assessment of the risks to the realisation of potential returns: this reflects BMI’s assessments ofoverall country risk, together with the regulatory and competitive environment.
The Philippines’ CBBER is 49.1. In the context of Asia Pacific, this means that the Philippines is not anattractive country; its CBBERs is the third lowest after Bangladesh and Sri Lanka. The ratings score forthe market structure - the most important component of the assessment of the limits to potential returns -is just 41.3; in the region, only Bangladesh has a lower rating.
|
0 items
