In March 2008, we updated all data for the 59 countries surveyed with official figures, sourced fromcentral banks and regulators. In most cases, we were able to find data that pertained to the end of 2007: inalmost all other cases, the data pertains to September 30 2007. As a result, the insights that we derive onparticular countries are based on consistently sourced information that is far more current than it had beenpreviously.
Although we gather data for countries such as the US, Japan, Australia and the eurozone, the vastmajority of the 59 countries whose banking industries we survey are, or are generally seen as being,emerging markets. For all the widely publicised problems of large banks in developed countries, in thewake of the subprime banking crisis in the US, 2007 was an extremely good year for the banking sectorsof the emerging markets. In local currency terms, the median growth in assets was 21% (in Brazil). Themedian rates of growth in loans to non-bank customers and in deposits were 22% (in India) and 18% (inMorocco). In some countries - and not just those enjoying oil booms - the figures were spectacular. InUkraine, for instance, assets and deposits rose by 76% and 62% respectively. Loans grew by more thanone-third in Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovenia, Peru, Bahrain, Iranand Nigeria. Deposits also rose by more than one-third in most of these countries.
In absolute terms, Romania’s banking sector enjoyed strong growth through the year to December 312007. In local currency terms, total assets, total loans and total deposits increased by 48%, 147% and110% respectively. The loan/deposit, loan/asset and loan/GDP ratios all rose.
Of course, this growth must be considered in the context of the other countries surveyed by BMI. Of the59 countries surveyed, Romania ranks fifth in terms of local currency asset growth, a winning first interms of local currency loan growth and also first in terms of local currency deposit growth. Romania’srankings in terms of its loan/deposit, loan/asset and loan/GDP ratios are 21st, first and 32nd, respectively.In a country with per capita GDP of US$7,233, deposits per capita are US$4,275.
In Q108, we envisaged that total assets, total loans and total deposits would rise by 35%, 30% and 25%annually through the 2007-2012 forecast period. Now, and using an improved forecasting method, we arelooking for growth rates of 25%, 60% and 47% respectively.
Since Q108, we have calculated, on a consistent basis, a Commercial Bank Business Environment Rating(CBBER) for each of the 59 countries surveyed. The CBBER includes an assessment of the limits ofpotential returns: it does this by taking into account the size, growth potential and bancassurancepotential of the banking sector, as well as aspects of the economy in 2007. The CBBER also depends onan assessment of the risks to the realisation of potential returns: this reflects BMI’s assessments ofoverall country risk, together with the regulatory and competitive environment.
Romania’s CBBER is 62.1. In the context of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), this means it is arelatively attractive country; the CBBERs are higher in Greece, Hungry, Poland and Russia. The analysisalso shows that within the limits to potential return, the banking elements and the country elements score66.3 and 52.5 respectively. Placing this in context we note that the banking elements of the limits topotential returns are tied with Poland as the second-highest score in the region (only Turkey rates higher).
|
0 items
