In March 2008, we updated all data for the 59 countries surveyed with official figures, sourced fromcentral banks and regulators. In most cases, we were able to find data that pertained to the end of 2007: inalmost all other cases, the data pertains to September 30 2007. As a result, the insights that we derive onparticular countries are based on consistently sourced information that is far more current than it had beenpreviously.
Although we gather data for countries such as the US, Japan, Australia and the eurozone, the vastmajority of the 59 countries whose banking industries we survey are, or are generally seen as being,emerging markets. For all the widely publicised problems of large banks in developed countries, in thewake of the subprime banking crisis in the US, 2007 was an extremely good year for the banking sectorsof the emerging markets. In local currency terms, the median growth in assets was 21% (in Brazil). Themedian rates of growth in loans to non-bank customers and in deposits were 22% (in India) and 18% (inMorocco). In some countries - and not just those enjoying oil booms - the figures were spectacular. InUkraine, for instance, assets and deposits rose by 76% and 62% respectively. Loans grew by more thanone-third in Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovenia, Peru, Bahrain, Iranand Nigeria. Deposits also rose by more than one-third in most of these countries.
In absolute terms, Singapore’s banking sector enjoyed reasonable growth through the year to December31 2007. In local currency terms, total assets, total loans and total deposits increased by 14%, 20% and16% respectively. The loan/deposit, loan/asset and loan/GDP ratios all rose.
Relative to other countries surveyed by BMI, these achievements are not particularly impressive. Of the59 countries surveyed, Singapore ranks 40th in terms of local currency asset growth and 35th in terms ofboth local currency loan growth and local currency deposit growth. Singapore’s rankings in terms of itsloan/deposit, loan/asset and loan/GDP ratios are 47th, 51st and 11th, respectively. In a country with percapita GDP of US$35,110, deposits per capita are US$49,266.
In Q108, we envisaged that total assets, total loans and total deposits would rise by 10%, 6% and 10%annually through the 2007-2012 forecast period. Now, and using an improved forecasting method, we arelooking for growth rates of 10%, 12% and 10% respectively.
Since Q108, we have calculated, on a consistent basis, a Commercial Bank Business Environment Rating(CBBER) for each of the 59 countries surveyed. The CBBER includes an assessment of the limits ofpotential returns: it does this by taking into account the size, growth potential and bancassurancepotential of the banking sector, as well as aspects of the economy in 2007. The CBBER also depends onan assessment of the risks to the realisation of potential returns: this reflects BMI’s assessments ofoverall country risk, together with the regulatory and competitive environment.
Singapore’s CBBER is 77.0. In the context of the Asia Pacific region, this means it is a very attractivecountry; its CBBER is equal to Australia and only slightly lower than that of Hong Kong. The majorproblems are related to the limits to potential returns and the small potential for growth across the bankingsector. The ratings score for the market structure - the most important component of the assessment of thelimits to potential returns - is relatively much lower compared to other countries in the region, at 71.9.Overall, however, Singapore scores well for the risks to potential returns, and, in relation to the standardsof the Asia Pacific region, the ratings score for the economy - at 73.3 - is very high.
|
0 items
