Industry Research Reports and Market Analysis at MindBranch.com

The 2007-2012 Outlook for Corn Grits and Flakes for Human Consumption Made in Corn Mills for Brewers' Use in the United States

Published By: Icon Group International, Inc.
September 2006
R307-27437
Online Download   $495.00
Description

This study covers the latent demand outlook for corn grits and flakes for human consumption made in corn mills for brewers’ use across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 7,400 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of it’s state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis-à-vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for corn grits and flakes for human consumption made in corn mills for brewers’ use. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved.

This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for corn grits and flakes for human consumption made in corn mills for brewers’ use in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.
Table of Contents
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Overview
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.?
1.3 The Methodology
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
2.1 Latent Demand in The US
3 FAR WEST
3.1 Executive Summary
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington
4 GREAT LAKES
4.1 Executive Summary
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin
5 MID-ATLANTIC
5.1 Executive Summary
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania
6 NEW ENGLAND
6.1 Executive Summary
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont
7 PLAINS
7.1 Executive Summary
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota
8 ROCKIES
8.1 Executive Summary
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming
9 SOUTHEAST
9.1 Executive Summary
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia
10 SOUTHWEST
10.1 Executive Summary
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS
11.1 Disclaimers Safe Harbor
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions

Order Form
       * Please reference product number R307-27437 when ordering or inquiring.
PUBLICATION:   The 2007-2012 Outlook for Corn Grits and Flakes for Human Consumption Made in Corn Mills for Brewers' Use in the United States
QTY. FORMAT PRICE TOTAL
  Online Download$495.00   
  SUBTOTAL   
SHIPPING CHARGES
 (U.S. $25, Canada $35, Int'l $65) 		 
TOTAL  

CONTACT INFORMATION
PAYMENT INFORMATION
Name ____________________________________________ MasterCard VISA AmEx Discover

__________________________________
Account number                 Exp. date

__________________________________
Signature

__________________________________
Email

Please invoice
      (shipment on receipt of payment)
Payment enclosed
*CHECKS / WIRE TRANSFERS:
Checks must be paid in U.S. funds.
Please call for details.
Company ____________________________________________
Job Title ____________________________________________
Address ____________________________________________
City ____________________________________________
Company ____________________________________________
State ______________________________   Zip__________
Country ____________________________________________
Phone ____________________________________________
MindBranch, Inc.,     131 Ashland St., Suite 200 North Adams, MA  01247       tel: 800-774-4410     fax: +1-413-664-9791     www.mindbranch.com