|
Japan WAN Managers Survey 2006Product Type: Market Research ReportPublished by: IDC Published: July 2006 Product Code: R104-26981 Description
This IDC study (which is a translation of the Japanese report #J6060104) analyzes the results of the Japan WAN Managers Survey 2006 conducted among network managers of companies with more than or equal to 100 employees. The main services covered in this study are WAN services like leased lines, wide area Ethernet, and IP VPN remote access. The survey results are also cross tabulated in this study by industry. The current Japan WAN Managers Survey is the fifth of such surveys conducted by IDC. Comparisons with the previous year's survey results are conducted where necessary. "The trends illuminated by the current survey include the rapid expansion of low-cost Internet VPN and the tendency among users to continue using leased lines which offer higher reliability. While IP VPN is approaching maturity, wide area Ethernet continues to show stable growth. However, due to the maturation of the overall WAN market, providers are finding it increasingly difficult to attract new users. In the future, it will be necessary for providers to offer WAN services with stronger appeal in the corporate market," observes Hiroyuki Kadowaki, senior communications market analyst, Communications Group, IDC Japan. Table of Contents
Table of ContentsIDC Opinion In This Study Methodology Figure: Distribution by Company Size (Number of Employees) Figure: Distribution by Industry Figure: Distribution by Company Size (Turnover) Figure: Distribution by Company Size (Number of WAN Connection Points in Japan) Figure: Distribution by Head Office Location Executive Summary Situation Overview WAN Overview Japan WAN Figure: Number of Offices Connected to WAN in Japan, 2004-2006 Figure: WAN Connection Rate in Japan, 2004-2006 Figure: Regional Office Distribution, 2005 and 2006 WAN Outside Japan Figure: Number of Offices Connected to WAN Outside Japan, 2005 and 2006 Figure: WAN Connection Rate outside Japan, 2003-2006 WAN Data Figure: WAN Data, 2004-2006 Figure: WAN Data Protocol by Industry Figure: WAN Multicast Deployment, 2004-2006 Figure: WAN Multicast Deployment: Objective WAN Service Figure: WAN Technologies Figure: WAN Technologies, 2005 and 2006 Figure: WAN Technologies by Industry Figure: WAN Technologies: Distribution, 2005 and 2006 Figure: WAN Technologies: Manufacturing, 2005 and 2006 Figure: WAN Technologies: Social Infrastructure, 2005 and 2006 Figure: WAN Technologies: Service, 2005 and 2006 Figure: WAN Technologies: Financial, 2005 and 2006 Figure: WAN Technologies: Government, 2005 and 2006 Figure: WAN Technology Deployment Plans Figure: WAN Technology Deployment Plans: Wide Area Ethernet by Industry Figure: WAN Technology Deployment Plans: Internet VPN by Industry Figure: WAN Technology Deployment Plans: Ethernet Leased Lines by Industry Figure: WAN Technology Deployment Plans: Lite VPN by Industry Figure: Primary Corporate WAN Services, 2004-2006 Figure: Primary Corporate WAN Services Figure: Primary Corporate WAN Services by Industry Figure: Primary WAN Connectivity Level, 2003-2006 Leased Lines Figure: Distribution by Number of WAN Leased Lines Deployed, 2004-2006 Figure: Distribution by Leased Line Speed, 2002-2006 Figure: Leased Line Deployment Plans for Next One Year, 2004-2006 Figure: Leased Line Deployment Plans for Next Two Years, 2004-2006 Figure: Reasons for Maintaining/Expanding WAN Leased Lines, 2005 and 2006 Internet VPN/IP VPN/Lite VPN Internet VPN/IP VPN/lite VPN Deployment Figure: Internet VPN/IP VPN (Standard/Lite) Deployment Trends, 2003-2006 Figure: Internet VPN/IP VPN (Standard)/Lite VPN Deployment Trends, 2006 Figure: Internet VPN/IP VPN (Standard)/Lite VPN Access Line Shares Figure: Internet VPN Providers, 2005 and 2006 Figure: Internet VPN Providers by Industry Figure: Internet VPN/IP VPN (Standard)/Lite VPN Value-Added Service Deployment Trends, 2004-2006 Figure: Internet VPN/IP VPN (Standard)/Lite VPN Deployment Objectives Figure: Internet VPN Network Plans Figure: IP VPN (Standard) Network Plans Internet VPN/IP VPN/Lite VPN Connections Figure: Sample Distribution by Number of Offices Connected to Internet VPN/IP VPN (Standard)/Lite VPN, 2003-2006 Figure: Internet VPN/IP VPN (Standard)/Lite VPN Deployment Plans (Number of Connection Points), 2004-2006 Figure: Internet VPN/IP VPN (standard)/Lite VPN Access Technologies, 2004-2006 Figure: Internet VPN/IP VPN (Standard)/Lite VPN Access Line Speed, 2004-2006 Internet VPN/IP VPN/Lite VPN Remote Access Figure: Internet VPN/IP VPN (Standard)/Lite VPN Remote Access, 2004-2006 Figure: Internet VPN/IP VPN (standard)/Lite VPN Remote Access Plans for Next One Year, 2004-2006 Figure: Internet VPN/IP VPN (Standard)/Lite VPN Remote Access Technologies, 2003-2006 Wide Area Ethernet Wide Area Ethernet Deployment Trends Figure: Wide Area Ethernet Service Deployment, 2003-2006 Figure: Wide Area Ethernet Topologies, 2003-2006 Wide Area Ethernet Service Connectivity Figure: Sample Distribution by Number of Offices Connected to Wide Area Ethernet, 2004-2006 Figure: Wide Area Ethernet Deployment Plans (Number of Connection Points) for Next One Year, 2004-2006 Figure: Wide Area Ethernet Network Plans Figure: Wide Area Ethernet Access Line Technologies, 2004-2006 Figure: Wide Area Ethernet Access Line Speed, 2004-2006 Figure: Access Methods: Interest Level Remote Access Remote Access Connections Figure: Companies that Provide Remote Access Functions, 2002-2006 Figure: Employees With Remote Access to LAN by Industry Figure: Employees With Remote Access Rights, 2002-2006 Figure: Remote Access Deployment Objectives, 2003-2006 Figure: Remote Access Service Deployment, 2005 and 2006 Remote Access Technologies Figure: Remote Access Technologies, 2002-2006 Figure: Remote Access Technologies, 2005 and 2006 Figure: Remote Access Methods Considered for Deployment Within One Year, 2005 and 2006 Mobile Centrex Figure: Mobile Centrex Deployment WLAN Internal WLAN Access Figure: WLAN Deployment, 2005 and 2006 Figure: WLAN Deployment Objectives (Current and Plan), 2005 and 2006 Figure: Interest in Outsourcing WLAN Operation Management, Security and Other Functions to Carriers, 2005 and 2006 Public WLAN Access Figure: WLAN Access Service Deployment Trends, 2005 and 2006 Figure: Reasons for Not Planning to Use Public WLAN Access Services, 2005 and 2006 Service Provider Selection Selection Criterias Figure: Carrier Selection Criteria (Top 3) Figure: Carrier Selection Criteria (Top 3), 2004-2006 Figure: Carrier Selection Criteria (Fourth to Tenth) Provider Selection Figure: Number of Quotations Requested for Prior to Communications Service Deployment, 2003-2006 Figure: Single/Multiple Communications Service Providers, 2003-2006 Figure: Adoption of SI/NI Opinions Figure: Choice of Providers: Past One Year Figure: Choice of Providers: Future Plans Service Improvement Demands Figure: Improvements Desired From Communications Providers Figure: WAN Services: Desired Bandwidth Guarantee, 2005 and 2006 Figure: Level of Inconvenience Tolerated as Trade-Off for Security Reinforcement Communications Budgets Current Budgets Figure: Annual Communications Budgets, 2004-2006 Figure: Annual Communications Budgets (Less Than 50 Million Yen and More Than or Equal to 50 Million Yen), 2004-2006 Figure: Annual Communications Budgets, 2004-2006 Budget Trends Figure: Annual Communications Budget Plans, 2003-2006 Figure: Annual Communications Budget Plans by Industry Figure: Annual Communications Budget Plans: Voice and Data Figure: Voice Communications Budget Plans, 2003-2006 Figure: Data Communications Budget Plans, 2003-2006 Future Outlook Essential Guidance Actions to Consider Learn More Related Research Synopsis |
|
||||||||
MindBranch has been the leading provider of industry and investment research from more than 550 independent research firms since 1992. With over 90,000 market research reports, MindBranch is your trusted source of competitive business intelligence. |