Product Type: Market Research Report
Published by: Technology Futures
Published: February 2003
Product Code: R13-29Description This report addresses the economic life of single-mode fiber optic cable installed by incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) in the local exchange network. The depreciation lives of these cables are derived from analysis of demand, technology substitution, physical mortality, and competitive factors. The technology and competitive issues driving network changes are explained in detail.
Key Findings From This Latest TFI Report
- Today's embedded standard single mode fiber cables are already obsolete for high-density, long-haul applications and may also become so in the local exchange.
- There are three types of advanced fibers available today that have significant advantages when CWDM or DWDM are utilized.
- TFI forecasts that approximately 95% of U.S. households will be online by 2020, and almost all of these will be broadband users.
- Presently, there is very little fiber in the distribution plant. The timing of placing distribution is late enough that, in all likelihood, it will be advanced fiber. With long-haul fiber already using advanced fiber and newly placed distribution fiber also being advanced fiber, a bottleneck will be created in the middle of the network that contains the most outdated single-mode fiber.
- TFI forecasts that, by 2010, ILECs will provision one-third fewer access lines than today, and that, by 2015, less than half as many. Competition will strand large quantities of network equipment — including fiber cables, reducing the economic life.
- TFI continues to recommend a projection life of 15 to 20 years for non-metallic cable.
Who should read this report?
- Incumbent local exchange carriers
- Competitive LECs
- Interexchange carriers
- Internet service providers
- Telecom equipment manufacturers
- Regulatory personnel
- Depreciation professionals
Table of Contents
- Chapter One: Introduction and Executive Summary
- Depreciation Background
- Physical Mortality
- Technology Obsolescence
- Technology-Driven Substitution
- TFI Recommendations for Non-Metallic Cable Depreciation
- Chapter Two: Mortality Analysis
- Aging
- Hazards
- Mortality Curves
- Chapter Three: Competitive Factors
- Competition from CLECs
- Competition from Cable Television
- Wireless Competition
- Competition from Broadband
- Forecasts for Competition in the Local Exchange
- Chapter Four: Technology Obsolescence
- Background
- Technical Issues
- Advantages of Advanced Fiber
- Full Spectrum Fiber
- Chapter Five: Demand-Driven Substitution
- Background
- Demand-Driven Forecasts
- Chapter Six: Technology-Driven Substitution
- Chapter Seven: Conclusions
- Appendix: Forecasting Methods
- Example
- Impact of Competition
- Estimation of Depreciation Lives
- Contrast with the Mortality Approach
- List of Exhibits with Featured Graph
- Figure 1.1 Age-Survivor Curve for Fiber Optic Cable
- Figure 1.2 Survivor Curve (Installed Base)
- Figure 1.3 Substitution of Advanced Fiber for Standard Single-Mode Fiber Optic Cable — Based on Distribution Fiber Adoption Scenarios
- Figure 1.4 Mortality and Technology Survivor Curves for Standard Single-Mode Fiber Optic Cable — Technology Substitution Based on Interoffice and Feeder Fiber for Metallic Substitutions (Not Accounting for Competitive Impacts)
- Figure 1.5 Combined Survivor Curves for Standard Single-Mode Fiber Optic Cable — Technology Substitution Based on Middle Scenario Distribution Fiber Adoption
- Figure 1.6 Substitution of Advanced Fiber for Standard Single-Mode Fiber Optic Cable — Based on Interoffice and Feeder Fiber for Metallic Substitutions
- Figure 1.7 Mortality and Technology Survivor Curves for Standard Single-Mode Fiber Optic Cable — Technology Substitution Based on Interoffice and Feeder Fiber for Metallic Substitutions (Not Accounting for Competitive Impacts)
- Figure 1.8 Combined Survivor Curves for Standard Single-Mode Fiber Optic Cable — Technology Substitution Based on Interoffice and Feeder Fiber for Metallic Substitutions
- Figure 2.1 Age-Survivor Curve for Fiber Optic Cable
- Figure 2.2 Survivor Curve (Installed Base)
- Figure 3.1 U.S. Residential Switched Access Lines (Narrowband), Millions of Lines by Type
- Figure 3.2 U.S. ILEC-Provisioned Residential Switched Access Lines (Includes UNEs and Resale), Millions of Lines — Narrowband and Broadband
- Figure 4.1 North American Data-Rate Projections
- Figure 5.1 U.S. Broadband Households — TFI 2002 Forecast
- Figure 5.2 Analog Modem and Broadband Data Rates
- Figure 5.3 U.S. Broadband Households by Data Rate
- Figure 5.4 Broadband Minimum Availability — 24 Mb/s & Above
- Figure 5.5 Substitution of Advanced Fiber for Standard Single-Mode Fiber Optic Cable — Based on Distribution Fiber Adoption Scenarios
- Figure 5.6 Mortality and Technology Survivor Curves for Standard Single-Mode Fiber Optic Cable — Technology Substitution Based on Middle Scenario Distribution Fiber Adoption (Not Accounting for Competitive Impacts)
- Figure 5.7 Combined Survivor Curves for Standard Single-Mode Fiber Optic Cable — Technology Substitution Based on Middle Scenario Distribution Fiber Adoption
- Figure 6.1 Substitution of Advanced Fiber for Standard Single-Mode Fiber Optic Cable — Based on Interoffice and Feeder Fiber for Metallic Substitutions
- Figure 6.2 Mortality and Technology Survivor Curves for Standard Single-Mode Fiber Optic Cable — Technology Substitution Based on Interoffice and Feeder Fiber for Metallic Substitutions (Not Accounting for Competitive Impacts)
- Figure 6.3 Combined Survivor Curves for Standard Single-Mode Fiber Optic Cable — Technology Substitution Based on Interoffice and Feeder Fiber for Metallic Substitutions
|
|