Law Library Benchmarks, 2003 Edition: Industry Report

Law Library Benchmarks, 2003 Edition

Product Type: Market Research Report
Published by: Primary Research Group
Published: December 2002
Product Code: R180-027

Description

Law Library Benchmarks presents detailed data for academic, law firm, corporate law office, courthouse, federal and other legal libraries concering their use of emerging electronic information resources and their strategy for exploiting and purchasing these resources. The report includes chapters on databases, legal web sites, CD-ROM, new and used legal books, electronic and print journals, electronic and print directories, site licenses, legal info web sites, and much much more. The report examines the attitude of law firms, law schools and government bodies towards the future of their legal libraries, and looks at the level of virtual and physical user traffic in law libraries. The report presents data for government, law firm and law school law libraries and also breaks out data on a per partner basis. 80 law libraries participated including many from major law firms and law schools.

Table of Contents

Characteristics Of The Companies In The Sample

Summary Of Main Findings

Overall Spending On Legal Information
Spending For Major Commercial Online Services
Librarian View Of Fairness Of Fees Charged By Major Online Services
Document Delivery Requests
Charge-Back Fees To Patrons For Use Of Online Services
Free Trials Of Databases
Use Of Inter-Library Loan
Use Of Electronic Document Delivery Services
Charge Back Fees For Document Delivery
Charge Back Fees To Library Patrons For Use Of Lexis-Nexis And Westlaw
Cd-Rom
Librarian Time Spent Helping Individuals Not Present In The Library
Management View Of The Library
Frequently Used Emerging Web-Based Information Services
Print Subscriptions To Journals
Spending On Electronic Journals
Photocopying Machines
Cataloging
Content Site Licenses
Books
Book Ordering Practices
Directories
Number Of Visitors To The Library
Percentage Of Staff Time Spent Helping Patrons Outside The Library
Number Of Email And Phone Queries Answered In A Typical Day
Staff Time Spent On Loose Leaf Filings

Chapter One - Trends In Legal Info Purchasing

Chapter Two - Commercial Online Services

Chapter Three - Database Decision Making

Chapter Four - Electronic Document Delivery Services

Chapter Five - Cd Rom

Chapter Six - Help For Virtual Users

Chapter Seven - Management View Of Library

Chapter Eight - Use Of Emerging Web-Based Information Services & Research Practices

Chapter Nine - Print Journals

Chapter Ten - Electronic Journals

Chapter Eleven - Photocopying Machines

Chapter 12- Cataloging

Chapter Thirteen - Intranet & Other Content Site Licenses

Chapter Fourteen - Books

Chapter Fifteen - Directories

Chapter Sixteen - Management Practices

Other Reports Of Potential Interest From Primary Research Group Inc.

List of Tables

Table #1: Organizations In The Sample, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #2: Organizations In The Sample, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #3: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Spending For Federal Codes, Regulations, Cases & Commentary
Table #4: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Spending For Federal Codes, Regulations, Cases & Commentary, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #5: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Spending For Federal Codes, Regulations, Cases & Commentary, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #6: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Spending For Federal Codes, Regulations, Cases & Commentary, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #7: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Spending For State & Local Codes, Regulations, Cases & Commentary
Table #8: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Spending For State & Local Codes, Regulations, Cases & Commentary, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #9: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Spending For State & Local Codes, Regulations, Cases & Commentary, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #10: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Spending For State & Local Codes, Regulations, Cases & Commentary, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #11: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Spending For International Codes, Regulations, Cases & Commentary
Table #12: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Spending For International Codes, Regulations, Cases & Commentary, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #13: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Spending For International Codes, Regulations, Cases & Commentary, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #14: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Spending For International Codes, Regulations, Cases & Commentary, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #15: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Spending For Finding Aids & Reference Works Such As Directories, Indices, Digests, Encyclopedias And Other Reference Works
Table #16: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Spending For Finding Aids And Reference Works Such As Directories, Indices, Digests, Encyclopedias & Other Reference Works, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #17: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Spending For Finding Aids And Reference Works Such As Directories, Indices, Digests, Encyclopedias & Other Reference Works, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #18: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Spending For Finding Aids And Reference Works Such As Directories, Indices, Digests, Encyclopedias & Other Reference Works, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #19: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Spending For Non-Legal Materials Such As Books, Magazines, Newspapers And Non-Specifically Legal Newsletter
Table #20: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Spending For Non-Legal Materials Such As Books, Magazines, Newspapers And Non-Specifically Legal Newsletters, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #21: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Spending For Non-Legal Materials Such As Books, Magazines, Newspapers And Non-Specifically Legal Newsletters, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #22: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Spending For Non-Legal Materials Such As Books, Magazines, Newspapers And Non-Specifically Legal Newsletters, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #23: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Spending For Legal Journals & Legal Theory
Table #24: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Spending For Legal Journals & Legal Theory, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #25: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Spending For Legal Journals & Legal Theory, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #26: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Spending For Legal Journals & Legal Theory, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #27: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Spending For Subject Specific Legal Materials About Particular Areas On The Law
Table #28: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Spending For Subject Specific Legal Materials About Particular Areas On The Law, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #29: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Spending For Subject Specific Legal Materials About Particular Areas On The Law, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #30: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Spending For Subject Specific Legal Materials About Particular Areas On The Law, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #31: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Major Commercial Online Digital Spending Accounted For By Westlaw Or Other Services From West Publishing
Table #32: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Major Commercial Online Digital Spending Accounted For By Westlaw Or Other Services From West Publishing, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #33: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Major Commercial Online Digital Spending Accounted For By Westlaw Or Other Services From West Publishing, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #34: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Major Commercial Online Digital Spending Accounted For By Westlaw Or Other Services From West Publishing, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #35: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Major Commercial Online Digital Spending Accounted For By Lexis-Nexis
Table #36: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Major Commercial Online Digital Spending Accounted For By Lexis-Nexis, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #37: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Major Commercial Online Digital Spending Accounted For By Lexis-Nexis, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #38: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Major Commercial Online Digital Spending Accounted For By Lexis-Nexis, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #39: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Major Commercial Online Digital Spending Accounted For By Providers Other Than Westlaw Or Lexis-Nexis
Table #40: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Major Commercial Online Digital Spending Accounted For By Providers Other Than West Or Lexis-Nexis, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #41: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Major Commercial Online Digital Spending Accounted For By Providers Other Than West Or Lexis-Nexis, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #42: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Major Commercial Online Digital Spending Accounted For By Providers Other Than West Or Lexis-Nexis, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #43: Library Staff Assessment Of Value For The Money Of Fees For Major Commercial Online Services
Table #44: Library Staff Assessment Of Value For The Money Of Fees For Major Commercial Online Services, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #45: Library Staff Assessment Of Value For The Money Of Fees For Major Commercial Online Services, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #46: Library Staff Assessment Of Value For The Money Of Fees For Major Commercial Online Services, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #47: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Charge Back To Patrons Any Fees For The Use Of Lexis-Nexis Or Westlaw
Table #48: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Charge Back To Patrons Any Fees For The Use Of Lexis-Nexis Or Westlaw, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #49: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Charge Back To Patrons Any Fees For The Use Of Lexis-Nexis Or Westlaw, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #50: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Charge Back To Patrons Any Fees For The Use Of Lexis-Nexis Or Westlaw, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #51: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Cost Of Online Services Supported By Charge Back Fees
Table #52: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Cost Of Online Services Supported By Charge Back Fees, Broken Out By Type Of Library*
Table #53: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Cost Of Online Services Supported By Charge Back Fees, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #54: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Cost Of Online Services Supported By Charge Back Fees, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #55: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Database Subscriptions Examined In The Past Year On A Free Trial Basis
Table #56: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Database Subscriptions Examined In The Past Year On A Free Trial Basis, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #57: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Database Subscriptions Examined In The Past Year On A Free Trial Basis, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #58: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Database Subscriptions Examined In The Past Year On A Free Trial Basis, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #59: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Database Subscriptions Examined In The Past Year Per Partner On A Free Trial Basis By The Law Firm Libraries In The Sample
Table #60: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Database Examined To Which Access Was Subsequently Acquired
Table #61: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Databases Examined To Which Access Was Subsequently Acquired, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #62: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Databases Examined To Which Access Was Subsequently Acquired, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #63: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Databases Examined To Which Access Was Subsequently Acquired , Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #64: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Database Subscriptions That Libraries In The Sample Cancelled In The Past Year
Table #65: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Databases Subscriptions That Libraries In The Sample Cancelled In The Past Year, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #66: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Databases Subscriptions That Libraries In The Sample Cancelled In The Past Year, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #67: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Databases Subscriptions That Libraries In The Sample Cancelled In The Past Year, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #68: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Database Subscriptions That Libraries In The Sample Cancelled In The Past Year Due To Increase In The Cost Of The Database
Table #69: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Database Subscriptions That Libraries In The Sample Cancelled In The Past Year Due To Increase In The Cost Of The Database, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #70: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Database Subscriptions That Libraries In The Sample Cancelled In The Past Year Due To Increase In The Cost Of The Database, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #71: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Database Subscriptions That Libraries In The Sample Cancelled In The Past Year Due To Increase In The Cost Of The Database, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #72: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Database Subscriptions That Libraries In The Sample Cancelled In The Past Year Due To Insufficient Use
Table #73: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Database Subscriptions That Libraries In The Sample Cancelled In The Past Year Due To Insufficient Use, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #74: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Database Subscriptions That Libraries In The Sample Cancelled In The Past Year Due To Insufficient Use, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #75: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Database Subscriptions That Libraries In The Sample Cancelled In The Past Year Due To Insufficient Use, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #76: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Provide Journal Articles Through Inter-Library Loan Requests
Table #77: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Provide Journal Articles Through Inter-Library Loan Requests, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #78: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Provide Journal Articles Through Inter-Library Loan Requests, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #79: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Provide Journal Articles Through Inter-Library Loan Requests, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #80: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Provide Journal Articles Through Electronic Document Delivery Services
Table #81: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Provide Journal Articles Through Electronic Document Delivery Services, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #82: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Provide Journal Articles Through Electronic Document Delivery Services, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #83: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Provide Journal Articles Through Electronic Document Delivery Services, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #84: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Provide Journal Articles Through Traditional Document Delivery Services
Table #85: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Provide Journal Articles Through Traditional Document Delivery Services, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #86: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Provide Journal Articles Through Traditional Document Delivery Services, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #87: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Provide Journal Articles Through Traditional Document Delivery Services, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #88: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Usage Of Electronic Document Delivery
Table #89: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Usage Of Electronic Document Delivery, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #90: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Usage Of Electronic Document Delivery, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #91: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Usage Of Electronic Document Delivery, Broken Out Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #92: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Change In Use Of Overall Electronic Document Delivery Service Over The Past Two Years
Table #93: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Change In Use Of Overall Electronic Document Delivery Service Over The Past Two Years, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #94: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Change In Use Of Overall Electronic Document Delivery Service Over The Past Two Years, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #95: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Change In Use Of Overall Electronic Document Delivery Service Over The Past Two Years, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #96: Extent To Which The Libraries Subsidize Document Delivery Service For Their Primary Clientele
Table #97: Extent To Which The Libraries Subsidize Document Delivery Service For Their Primary Clientele, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #98: Extent To Which The Libraries Subsidize Document Delivery Service For Their Primary Clientele, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #99: Extent To Which The Libraries Subsidize Document Delivery Service For Their Primary Clientele, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #100: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Faxon
Table #101: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Faxon, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #102: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Faxon, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #103: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Faxon, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #104: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Information Express
Table #105: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Information Express, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #106: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Information Express, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #107: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Information Express, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #108: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Infotrieve
Table #109: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Infotrieve, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #110: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Infotrieve, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #111: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Infotrieve, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #112: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Boalt Express
Table #113: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Boalt Express, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #114: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Boalt Express, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #115: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Boalt Express, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #116: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Ingenta Or Uncover
Table #117: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Ingenta Or Uncover, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #118: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Ingenta Or Uncover, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #119: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Ingenta Or Uncover, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #120: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Commercial Document Delivery Requests Received By The Librarians From Patrons In The Past Year
Table #121: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Commercial Document Delivery Requests Received By Librarians From Patrons In The Past Year, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #122: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Commercial Document Delivery Requests Received By Librarians From Patrons In The Past Year, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #123: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Commercial Document Delivery Requests Received By Librarians From Patrons In The Past Year, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #124: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Commercial Document Delivery Requests Received By Law Firm Librarians From Patrons In The Past Year, Measured On A Per Partner Basis*
*This Means That Firms With 10 Partners Would Have Averaged 48 Document Delivery Requests To The Library Per Year That Required The Use Of A Document Delivery Service.
Table #125: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Commercial Document Delivery Requests Received By The Libraries In The Sample That Were Fulfilled Through Email Or Web/Intranet Posting Of Electronic Documents
Table #126: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Commercial Document Delivery Requests Received By The Libraries In The Sample That Were Fulfilled Through Email Or Web/Intranet Posting Of Electronic Documents, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #127: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Commercial Document Delivery Requests Received By The Libraries In The Sample That Were Fulfilled Through Email Or Web/Intranet Posting Of Electronic Documents, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #128: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Commercial Document Delivery Requests Received By The Libraries In The Sample That Were Fulfilled Through Email Or Web/Intranet Posting Of Electronic Documents, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #129: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Subscriptions To Cd-Rom Databases Held By Libraries In The Sample
Table #130: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Subscriptions To Cd-Rom Databases Held By Libraries In The Sample, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #131: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Subscriptions To Cd-Rom Databases Held By Libraries In The Sample, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #132: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Subscriptions To Cd-Rom Databases Held By Libraries In The Sample, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #133: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Subscriptions To Cd-Rom Databases Per Partner Held By The Law Firm Libraries In The Sample
Table #134: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S) On Cd-Rom Database Licenses In 2001
Table #135: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S) On Cd-Rom Database Licenses In 2001, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #136: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S) On Cd-Rom Database Licenses In 2001, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #137: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S) On Cd-Rom Database Licenses In 2001, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #138: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S) On Cd-Rom Database Licenses In 2002
Table #139: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S) On Cd-Rom Database Licenses In 2002, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #140: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S) On Cd-Rom Database Licenses In 2002, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #141: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S) On Cd-Rom Database Licenses In 2002, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #142: Spending (In $, U.S.) On Cd-Rom Database Licenses, 2001 And 2002 Compared
Table #143: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) On Cd-Rom Database Licenses Per Partner In 2002
Table #144: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) On Cd-Rom Database Licenses Per Partner In 2002, Broken Out By Size Of Firm
Table #145: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Librarian Work Time Spent On Attending Individuals Not In The Library That Are Using Remote Databases And Services Offered By The Library
Table #146: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Librarian Work Time Spent On Attending Individuals Not In The Library That Are Using Remote Databases And Services Offered By The Library, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #147: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Librarian Work Time Spent On Attending Individuals Not In The Library That Are Using Remote Databases And Services Offered By The Library, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #148: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Librarian Work Time Spent On Attending Individuals Not In The Library That Are Using Remote Databases And Services Offered By The Library, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #149: Attitude Of Management Concerning The Future Of The Library
Table #150: Attitude Of Management Concerning The Future Of The Library, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #151: Attitude Of Management Concerning The Future Of The Library, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #152: Attitude Of Management Concerning The Future Of The Library, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #153: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Northern Light
Table #154: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Northern Light, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #155: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Northern Light, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #156: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Northern Light, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #157: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Netlibrary
Table #158: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Netlibrary, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #159: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Netlibrary, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #160: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Netlibrary, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #161: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Hoovers Online
Table #162: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Hoovers Online, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #163: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Hoovers Online, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #164: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Hoovers Online, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #165: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Books 24x7
Table #166: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Books24x7, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #167: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Books24x7, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #168: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Books24x7, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #169: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Gigalow.Com
Table #170: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Gigalow.Com, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #171: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Gigalow.Com, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #172: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Gigalow.Com, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #173: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Lawrunner.Com
Table #174: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Lawrunner.Com, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library 79
Table #175: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Lawrunner.Com, Broken Out By Number Of Partners 79
Table #176: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Lawrunner.Com, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #177: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Law.Com
Table #178: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Law.Com, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #179: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Law.Com, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #180: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Law.Com, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #181: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Findlaw.Com
Table #182: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Findlaw.Com, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #183: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Findlaw.Com, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #184: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Findlaw.Com, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #185: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Lawguru.Com
Table #186: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Lawguru.Com, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #187: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Lawguru.Com, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #188: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Lawguru.Com, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #189: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Alllaw.Com
Table #190: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Alllaw.Com, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #191: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Alllaw.Com, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #192: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Alllaw.Com, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #193: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Lawsource.Com
Table #194: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Lawsource.Com, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #195: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Lawsource.Com, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #196: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Lawsource.Com, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #197: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Uslaw.Com
Table #198: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Uslaw.Com, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #199: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Uslaw.Com, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #200: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Uslaw.Com, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #201: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Lawresearch.Com
Table #202: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Lawresearch.Com, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #203: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Lawresearch.Com, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #204: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Lawresearch.Com, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #205: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Lectlaw.Com
Table #206: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Lectlaw.Com, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #207: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Lectlaw.Com, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #208: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Lectlaw.Com, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #209: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Megalaw.Com
Table #210: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Megalaw.Com, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library 87
Table #211: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Megalaw.Com, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #212: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Frequently Use Megalaw.Com, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #213: Mean, Median, Minimum & Maximum Number Of Print Subscriptions To Journals Maintained By The Libraries In 2001
Table #214: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Print Subscriptions To Journals Maintained By The Library In 2001, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #215: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Print Subscriptions To Journals Maintained By The Library In 2001, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #216: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Print Subscriptions To Journals Maintained By The Library In 2001, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #217: Mean, Median, Minimum & Maximum Number Of Print Subscriptions To Journals Maintained By The Library In 2002
Table #218: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Print Subscriptions To Journals Maintained By The Library In 2002, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #219: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Print Subscriptions To Journals Maintained By The Library In 2002, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #220: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Print Subscriptions To Journals Maintained By The Library In 2002, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #221: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Print Subscriptions To Journals Maintained Per Partner By The Law Firm Libraries In 2002
Table #222: Number Of Print Subscriptions To Journals Maintained By The Libraries In The Sample, 2001 And 2002 Compared
Table #223: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S) On Print Subscriptions To Journals In 2001
Table #224: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S) On Print Subscriptions To Journals In 2001, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #225: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S) On Print Subscriptions To Journals In 2001, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #226: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S) On Print Subscriptions To Journals In 2001, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #227: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) On Print Subscriptions To Journals In 2002
Table #228: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) On Print Subscriptions To Journals In 2002, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #229: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) On Print Subscriptions To Journals In 2002, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #230: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) On Print Subscriptions To Journals In 2002, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #231: Spending (In $, U.S.) On Print Subscriptions To Journals By The Libraries In The Sample, 2001 And 2002 Compared
Table #232: Mean, Median, Minimum, Maximum Spending Per Partner (In $, U.S.) On Print Subscriptions To Journals 2002
Table #233: Mean, Median, Minimum, Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) On Print Subscriptions Per Partner To Journals 2002, Broken Out By Size Of Firm
Table #234: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) On Subscriptions To Electronic Journals In 2001
Table #235: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) On Subscriptions To Electronic Journals In 2001, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #236: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) On Subscriptions To Electronic Journals In 2001, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #237: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) On Subscriptions To Electronic Journals In 2001, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #238: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) On Subscriptions To Electronic Journals In 2002
Table #239: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) On Subscriptions To Electronic Journals In 2002, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #240: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) On Subscriptions To Electronic Journals In 2002, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #241: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) On Subscriptions To Electronic Journals In 2002, Broken Out Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #242: Spending (In $, U.S.) On Subscriptions To Electronic Journals, 2001 And 2002 Compared
Table #243: Mean, Median, Minimum, Maximum Per Partner Spending (In $, U.S.) On Subscriptions To Electronic Journals 2002
Table #244: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Electronic Subscriptions To Journals That The Library Maintained In 2001
Table #245: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Electronic Subscriptions To Journals That The Library Maintained In 2001, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #246: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Electronic Subscriptions To Journals That The Library Maintained In 2001, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #247: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Electronic Subscriptions To Journals That The Library Maintained In 2001, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #248: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Electronic Subscriptions To Journals That The Library Maintained In 2002
Table #249: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Electronic Subscriptions To Journals That The Library Maintained In 2002, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #250: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Electronic Subscriptions To Journals That The Library Maintained In 2002, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #251: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Electronic Subscriptions To Journals That The Library Maintained In 2002, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #252: Number Of Electronic Subscriptions To Journals That The Library Maintained, 2001 And 2002 Compared
Table #253: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Subscriptions To Electronic Journals Sample That Require Subscription Fees Maintained By The Libraries In The Sample That Require Subscription Fees
Table #254: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Subscriptions To Electronic Journals Maintained By The Libraries In The, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #255: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Subscriptions To Electronic Journals That Require Subscription Fees Maintained By The Libraries In The Sample, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #256: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Subscriptions To Electronic Journals Sample That Require Subscription Fees Maintained By The Libraries In The, Broken Out By Number Of Materials Expenditure
Table #257: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Subscriptions To Electronic Journals With No Print Counterpart That Libraries Subscribed To In 2001
Table #258: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Subscriptions To Electronic Journals With No Print Counterpart That Libraries Subscribed To In 2001, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #259: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Subscriptions To Electronic Journals With No Print Counterpart That Libraries Subscribed To In 2001, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #260: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Subscriptions To Electronic Journals With No Print Counterpart That Libraries Subscribed To In 2001, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #261: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Subscriptions To Electronic Journals With No Print Counterpart That Libraries Subscribed To In 2002
Table #262: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Subscriptions To Electronic Journals With No Print Counterpart That Libraries Subscribed To In 2002, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #263: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Subscriptions To Electronic Journals With No Print Counterpart That Libraries Subscribed To In 2002, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #264: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Subscriptions To Electronic Journals With No Print Counterpart That Libraries Subscribed To In 2002, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #265: Number Of Subscriptions To Electronic Journals With No Print Counterpart That Libraries Subscribes To, 2001 And 2002 Compared
Table #266: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Print Journal Subscriptions With Free Access To An Electronic Version
Table #267: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Print Journal Subscriptions With Free Access To An Electronic Version, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #268: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Print Journal Subscriptions With Free Access To An Electronic Version, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #269: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Print Journal Subscriptions With Free Access To An Electronic Version, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #270: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Photocopy Machines Patron Use In 2001
Table #271: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Photocopy Machines For Patron Use In 2001, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #272: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Photocopy Machines For Patron Use In 2001, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #273: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Photocopy Machines For Patron Use In 2001, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #274: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Photocopy Machines For Patron Use In 2002
Table #275: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Photocopy Machines For Patron Use In 2002, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #276: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Photocopy Machines For Patron Use In 2002, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #277: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Photocopy Machines For Patron Use In 2002, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #278: Number Of Photocopy Machines That The Libraries In The Sample Maintained For Patron Use, 2001 And 2002 Compared
Table #279: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Charge Patrons For Photocopying Services
Table #280: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Charge Patrons For Photocopying Services, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #281: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Charge Patrons For Photocopying Services, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #282: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Charge Patrons For Photocopying Services, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #283: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Revenue Accrued From Photocopying Services In The Past Year
Table #284: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Revenue Accrued From Photocopying Services In The Past Year, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #285: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Revenue Accrued From Photocopying Services In The Past Year, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #286: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Revenue Accrued In The Past Year From Photocopying Services, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #287: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Library Revenue (In $ Us) Per Partner From Photocopying
Table #288: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Switched Online Catalogs In The Past Three Years
Table #289: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Switched Online Catalogs In The Past Three Years, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #290: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Switched Online Catalogs In The Past Three Years, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #291: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Switched Online Catalogs In The Past Three Years, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #292: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S) On Products, Equipment And Services Related To Online Cataloging By Libraries In The Sample In The Past Year
Table #293: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) On Products, Equipment And Services Related To Online Cataloging By Libraries In The Sample In The Past Year, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #294: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) On Products, Equipment And Services Related To Online Cataloging By Libraries In The Sample In The Last Year, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #295: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) On Products, Equipment And Services Related To Online Cataloging By Libraries In The Sample In The Last Year, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #296: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Original Cataloging Performed In-House
Table #297: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Original Cataloging Performed In-House, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #298: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Original Cataloging Performed In-House, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #299: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Original Cataloging Performed In-House, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #300: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Copy-Cataloging Performed In-House
Table #301: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Copy Cataloging Performed In-House, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #302: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Copy Cataloging Performed In-House, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #303: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Copy Cataloging Performed In-House, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #304: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Copy Cataloging That Libraries Outsource
Table #305: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Have Electronic Site Licenses For Federal Codes, Cases Or Commentary
Table #306: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Have Electronic Site Licenses For Federal Codes, Cases Or Commentary, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #307: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Have Electronic Site Licenses For Federal Codes, Cases Or Commentary, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #308: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Have Electronic Site Licenses For Federal Codes, Cases Or Commentary, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #309: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Have Electronic Site Licenses For Scholarly Or Professional Journals
Table #310: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Have Electronic Site Licenses For Scholarly Or Professional Journals, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #311: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Have Electronic Site Licenses For Scholarly Or Professional Journals, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #312: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Have Electronic Site Licenses For Scholarly Or Professional Journals, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #313: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Have Electronic Site Licenses For Magazines Or Newspapers
Table #314: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Have Electronic Site Licenses For Magazines Or Newspapers, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #315: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Have Electronic Site Licenses For Magazines Or Newspapers, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #316: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Have Electronic Site Licenses For Magazines Or Newspapers, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #317: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Have Electronic Site Licenses For Directories
Table #318: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Have Electronic Site Licenses For Directories, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #319: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Have Electronic Site Licenses For Directories, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #320: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Have Electronic Site Licenses For Directories, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #321: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Have Electronic Site Licenses For Indices Or Reference Books
Table #322: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Have Site Licenses For Indices Or Reference Books, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #323: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Have Site Licenses For Indices Or Reference Books, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #324: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Have Site Licenses For Indices Or Reference Books, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #325: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Have Electronic Site Licenses For State Or Local Codes, Cases Or Commentary
Table #326: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Have Site Licenses For State Or Local Codes, Cases Or Commentary, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #327: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Have Site Licenses For State Or Local Codes, Cases Or Commentary, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #328: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Have Site Licenses For State Or Local Codes, Cases Or Commentary, Broken Out Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #329 Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) For Traditional Print Books In 2001
Table #330: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) For Traditional Print Books In 2001, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #331: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) For Traditional Print Books In 2001, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #332: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) For Traditional Print Books In 2001, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #333: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) For Traditional Print Books In 2002
Table #334: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S) For Traditional Print Books In 2002, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #335: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) For Traditional Print Books In 2002, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #336: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) For Traditional Print Books In 2002, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #337: Spending (In $, U.S) For Traditional Print Books, 2001 And 2002 Compared
Table #338:Mean, Median, Minimum, Maximum Per Partner Spending (In $, U.S.) For Traditional Print Books 2002 By The Law Firm Libraries In The Sample
Table #339: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Demand For Print Books From Patrons In The Past Two Years
Table #340: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Demand For Print Books From Patrons In The Past Two Years, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #341: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Demand For Print Books From Patrons In The Past Two Years, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #342: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Demand For Print Books From Patrons In The Past Two Years, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #343: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Books Ordered Through Websites As A Percentage Of Total Print Books Ordered Directly By The Library
Table #344: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Books Ordered Through Websites As A Percentage Of Total Print Books Ordered Directly By The Library, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #345: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Books Ordered Through Websites As A Percentage Of Total Print Books Ordered Directly By The Library, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #346: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Books Ordered Through Websites As A Percentage Of Total Print Books Ordered Directly By The Library, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #347: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) For E-Books Or Electronic Site Licenses For Books
Table #348: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) For E-Books Or Electronic Site Licenses For Books, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #349: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) For E-Books Or Electronic Site Licenses For Books, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #350: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) For E-Books Or Electronic Site Licenses For Books, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #351: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Are Considering The Purchase Of An E-Book Or Intranet License In The Upcoming Two Years In Which It Currently Does Not Have A Deal
Table #352: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Are Considering The Purchase Of An E-Book Or Intranet License In The Upcoming Two Years In Which It Currently Does Not Have A Deal, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #353: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Are Considering The Purchase Of An E-Book Or Intranet License In The Upcoming Two Years In Which It Currently Does Not Have A Deal, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #354: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Are Considering The Purchase Of An E-Book Or Intranet License In The Upcoming Two Years In Which It Currently Does Not Have A Deal, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #355: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) On Used Legal Books In The Past Year
Table #356: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) On Used Legal Books In The Past Year, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #357: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) On Used Legal Books In The Past Year, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #358: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) On Used Legal Books In The Past Year, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #359: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) For Subscriptions To Directories In Print Form In 2001
Table #360: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) For Subscriptions To Directories In Print Form In 2001, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #361: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) For Subscriptions To Directories In Print Form In 2001, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #362: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) For Subscriptions To Directories In Print Form In 2001, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #363: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) On Subscriptions To Directories In Print Form In 2002
Table #364: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) For Subscriptions To Directories In Print Form In 2002, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #365: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) For Subscriptions To Directories In Print Form In 2002, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #366: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) For Subscriptions To Directories In Print Form In 2002, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #367: Spending (In $, U.S) For Subscriptions To Directories In Print Form, 2001 And 2002 Compared
Table #368: Mean, Median, Minimum, Maximum Per Partner Spending (In $, U.S.) For Subscriptions To Directories In Print Form By The Law Firm Libraries In The Sample
Table #369: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) For Subscriptions To Directories In Online Electronic Forms, Including Web Access And Intranet Licenses In 2001
Table #370: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) For Subscriptions To Directories In Online Electronic Forms, Including Web Access And Intranet Licenses In 2001, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #371: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) For Subscriptions To Directories In Online Electronic Forms, Including Web Access And Intranet Licenses In 2001, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #372: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) For Subscriptions To Directories In Online Electronic Forms, Including Web Access And Intranet Licenses In 2001, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #373: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) For Subscriptions To Directories In Online Electronic Forms, Including Web Access And Intranet Licenses In 2002
Table #374: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) For Subscriptions To Directories In Online Electronic Forms, Including Web Access And Intranet Licenses In 2002, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #375: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) For Subscriptions To Directories In Online Electronic Forms, Including Web Access And Intranet Licenses In 2002, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #376: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) For Subscriptions To Directories In Online Electronic Forms, Including Web Access And Intranet Licenses In 2002, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #377: Spending (In $, U.S) For Subscriptions To Directories In Online Electronic Forms, Including Web Access And Intranet Licenses, 2001 And 2002 Compared
Table #378: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) For Subscriptions To Directories In Online Electronic Forms, Including Web Access And Intranet Licenses In 2002
Table #379: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) On Subscriptions To Cd-Rom Directories In 2002
Table #380: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) For Subscriptions To Cd-Rom Directories In 2002, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #381: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) For Subscriptions To Cd-Rom Directories In 2002, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #382: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Spending (In $, U.S.) For Subscriptions To Cd-Rom Directories In 2002, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #383: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Visitors The Library Receives At Its Physical Location On A Typical Business Day
Table #384: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Visitors The Library Receives At Its Physical Location On A Typical Business Day, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #385: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Visitors The Library Receives At Its Physical Location On A Typical Business Day, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #386: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Visitors The Library Receives At Its Physical Location On A Typical Business Day, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #387: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Visitors Per Partner The Law Firm Library Receives At Its Physical Location On A Typical Business Day
Table #388: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Library Visitors At Its Physical Location On A Typical Business Day
Table #389: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Library Visitors At Its Physical Location On A Typical Business Day, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #390: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Library Visitors At Its Physical Location On A Typical Business Day, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #391: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Library Visitors At Its Physical Location On A Typical Business Day, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #392: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Change In The Number Of Visitors To The Library In The Past Two Years
Table #393: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Change In The Number Of Visitors To The Library In The Past Two Years, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #394: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Change In The Number Of Visitors To The Library In The Past Two Years, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #395: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Change In The Number Of Visitors To The Library In The Past Two Years, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #396: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Library Staff Time Spent Helping Library Patrons And Clients Outside The Physical Library
Table #397: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Library Staff Time Spent Helping Library Patrons And Clients Outside The Physical Library, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #398: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Library Staff Time Spent Helping Library Patrons And Clients Outside The Physical Library, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #399: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of Library Staff Time Spent Helping Library Patrons And Clients Outside The Physical Library, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #400: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Email Queries Answered By Librarians On A Typical Day
Table #401: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Email Queries Answered By Librarians On A Typical Day, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #402: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Email Queries Answered By Librarians On A Typical Day, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #403: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Email Queries Answered By Librarians On A Typical Day, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #404: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Email Queries To The Law Firm Law Librarian Per Partner On A Typical Day
Table #405: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Telephone Reference Queries Answered By Librarians In A Typical Day
Table #406: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Telephone Reference Queries Answered By Librarians In A Typical Day, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #407: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Telephone Reference Queries Answered By Librarians In A Typical Day, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #408: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Telephone Reference Queries Answered By Librarians In A Typical Day, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #409: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Number Of Telephone Reference Queries Per Partner Answered By Law Firm Librarians In A Typical Day
Table #410: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of The Library's Staff Time That Is Accounted For By Loose-Leaf Filing And Other Pocket Part Replacement
Table #411: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of The Library's Staff Time That Is Accounted For By Loose-Leaf Filing And Other Pocket Part Replacement, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #412: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of The Library's Staff Time That Is Accounted For By Loose-Leaf Filing And Other Pocket Part Replacement, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #413: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Of The Library's Staff Time That Is Accounted For By Loose-Leaf Filing And Other Pocket Part Replacement, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #414: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Amount Of Staff Time In Loose-Leaf Filing And Other Pocket Part Replacement
Table #415: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Amount Of Staff Time In Loose-Leaf Filing And Other Pocket Part Replacement, Broken Out By Type Of Law Library
Table #416: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Amount Of Staff Time In Loose-Leaf Filing And Other Pocket Part Replacement, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #417: Percentage Of Libraries In The Sample That Increased, Decreased Or Maintained Stable Amount Of Staff Time In Loose-Leaf Filing And Other Pocket Part Replacement, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Table #418: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Change In The Past 2 Years In Staff Time Allocated To Loose-Leaf Filing And Other Pocket Part Replacement
Table #419: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Change In The Past 2 Years In Staff Time Allocated To Loose-Leaf Filing And Other Pocket Part Replacement, Broken Out By Type Of Library
Table #420: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Change In The Past 2 Years In Staff Time Allocated To Loose-Leaf Filing And Other Pocket Part Replacement, Broken Out By Number Of Partners
Table #421: Mean, Median, Minimum And Maximum Percentage Change In The Past 2 Years In Staff Time Allocated To Loose-Leaf Filing And Other Pocket Part Replacement, Broken Out By Level Of Materials Expenditure
Participants

Ordering and More Information

Price and Delivery Options

MindBranch has been the leading provider of industry and investment research from more than 550 independent research firms since 1992. With over 90,000 market research reports, MindBranch is your trusted source of competitive business intelligence.