Product Type: Market Research Report
Published by: Objective Analysis
Published: August 2009
Product Code: R3518-7Description In 2010 Intel will introduce Braidwood technology, placing NAND on the mother board and threatening SSDs in the PC, assuming that this is not a repeat of the Vista/Turbo Memory debacle, that is. Purchase this study to understand Braidwood, its potential market, competing technologies, and how the NAND, PC, HDD and DRAM markets will be impacted.
Table of Contents - Contents
- Executive Summary
- What is Braidwood?
- What is ONFi?
- Braidwood Shown at June Computex
- Key Underlying Technologies
- Elements of a Standard HDD
- Caches and Memory Performance
- NAND’s Nonvolatile Advantage
- Problems with NAND
- NAND in the Memory Hierarchy
- Memory Hierarchy
- Hybrid HDDs
- Intel’s Robson or Turbo Memory
- Turbo Memory: What Went Wrong?
- Windows 7 Enhancements Incremental
- The Braidwood Approach
- Why Braidwood Makes Sense when SSDs Don’t
- Braidwood vs. SSD Bandwidth
- Benefits of a NAND Layer
- Power Consumption
- Access Speed
- Faster Boot-Up
- Speedy Program Launch
- Reliability
- Shock Tolerance
- Summing Up the Advantages
- Software Support is Required
- Why a Cache Needs Software Support
- Pinning and The “Instant-On” Myth
- Legacy Issues
- Alternatives to Braidwood
- Conventional Architecture (No NAND)
- Strengths
- Weaknesses
- Solid State Drives
- Strengths
- Weaknesses
- Increased DRAM Main Memory
- Strengths
- Weaknesses
- Cost Implications of Braidwood
- How NAND Costs will Add to PC Costs
- Cost vs. Benefits of Each Approach
- Consumer Reaction to Braidwood’s Cost
- Braidwood’s Future
- A Forecast for Braidwood Shipments
- Revenue Forecast
- Braidwood’s Impact on the NAND Market
- Key NAND Suppliers Face Trouble
- How Braidwood will Impact the DRAM Market
- Summary
- Methodology
- Figures
- Tables
- Author
- Jim Handy
- Figure 1. ONFi NAND Flash Module
- Figure 2. Micro-Star International Motherboard with Braidwood ONFi Socket (arrows). 4
- Figure 3. Elements of a Hard Disk Drive
- Figure 4. NAND Prices Have Dropped Significantly below DRAM's
- Figure 5. Storage Hierarchy in a Typical Computing System
- Figure 6. Pyramid Diagram of NAND in the Memory Hierarchy
- Figure 7. Cost and Performance of Levels in the Memory Hierarchy
- Figure 8. Intel's Turbo Memory
- Figure 9. Latency of Various Media for 4KB Random Reads
- Figure 10. Relative Significance of System Overhead
- Figure 11. PC Power Savings from Adding a NAND Layer
- Figure 12. Services loaded during a Typical PC Bootstrap of Windows XP
- Figure 13. NAND Price per Gigabyte Forecast
- Figure 14. ONFi Module for Braidwood Unit Shipment Forecast
- Figure 15. Optimistic/Pessimistic Revenue Forecasts for NAND Consumption in PCs.. Figure 16. Braidwood Share of Total NAND Revenues
- Figure 17. DRAM Gigabyte Growth Historically Averages 56%
- Figure 18. DRAM Gigabyte Growth Will Slow With Braidwood Introduction
- Figure 19. DRAM Historical Revenues
- Figure 20. DRAM Revenues Likely to Decline after Braidwood Introduction
- Table 1. Breakdown of Latency in Different Media
- Table 2. Summary of Braidwood’s Features
- Table 3. Cost and Benefits of Braidwood and Its Alternatives
- Table 4. A Forecast for Braidwood Adoption and Related ONFi Module Shipments
- Table 5. Optimistic & Pessimistic Forecasts of Braidwood Average Capacity and
- Revenues
|
|