Product Type: Market Research Report
Published by: Mintel International Group Ltd.
Published: September 2007
Product Code: R560-2881Description Putting customers first is a well-used mantra by retailers seeking to remain closely connected to what customers want. But, how good are multi-channel retailers at listening and incorporating what they hear into their service offer?
This report assesses how retailers are delivering service through stores and online, and identifies which retailers are perceived by shoppers to be performing well on customer service delivery. It provides an assessment of the attributes of the shopping experience that consumers see as being important, and provides insight into how retailers can improve their service delivery on these attributes
Table of Contents - ISSUES IN THE MARKET
- Main issues addressed
- Main themes
- Abbreviations
- INSIGHTS AND OPPORTUNITIES
- MARKET IN BRIEF
- Customer service as a source of competitive advantage
- A good service experience is an essential element of a strong customer proposition
- Retailers are underdelivering on service - human factors a key culprit
- Best and worst - M&S ahead, electrical goods retailers underperforming
- The costs of delivering a bad experience - reversing the damaging ripple effect
- Leveraging complaints into business changing feedback
- Point of sale technology can create a more satisfying experience
- INDUSTRY INSIGHTS
- Service issues rising up the differentiation agenda
- Low service standards provide an opportunity to establish differentiation
- Tackling queues through self-scanning
- Tackling queues through workforce management systems
- Feedback strategies to include staff as well as customers
- Conclusion: Raising proposition awareness in staff contributes to service culture
- EMPHASISING SERVICE TO ESTABLISH AN ADVANTAGE
- Competitive environment creating pressure to raise service standards
- Key Points
- Service standards a key differentiator
- Key Points
- Low service standards create an opportunity
- Key Points
- TOWARDS AN INTEGRATED SALES/SERVICE CULTURE
- Service culture sits comfortably alongside a sales culture
- Key Points
- Engagement and interaction with customers stimulates both service and sales
- Key Points
- Good service should be delivered instinctively
- Key Points
- HOW ONLINE SERVICE STANDARDS DIFFER
- Managing a multi-stage process
- Key Points
- Personal contact versus automated responses
- Key Points
- Putting it right when things go wrong
- Key Points
- OVERCOMING WEAK SERVICE DELIVERY
- Bad attitude cannot be tolerated
- Key Points
- Intolerance of queuing
- Key Points
- Positive response to self-checkout technology
- Key Points
- Information delivery a vital area for attention
- Key Points
- No alternative to face to face contact
- Key Points
- DEVELOPING STAFF TO DELIVER GREAT SERVICE
- Employing the right people
- Key Points
- Accurate assessment of training needs
- Key Points
- Effective communication strategies
- Key Points
- Measuring performance
- Key Points
- Use of motivational and incentive schemes
- Key Points
- DEVELOPING THE CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE
- Focus on human factors
- Key Points
- Structured change
- Key Points
- Harnessing the power of complaints
- Key Points
- Delivering satisfaction for staff and customers
- Key Points
- INTERNAL MARKET ENVIRONMENT
- QUALITY OF ENGAGEMENT DEFINES SERVICE STANDARDS
- Degree of emphasis on engagement is a prime indicator of a retailer’s commitment to service
- Identifying critical engagement points provides the opportunity to deliver great service
- Pre-purchase information gathering
- Staff engagement in-store
- Gaining information and getting help once in-store
- Discussing needs and using staff to help assess the options
- Completing the sale
- After-sales service
- RISING OPERATING COSTS AND SERVICE STANDARDS
- Delivering better service experience without increasing staff costs
- Integrated sales and service ethos
- Cutting service standards a risk
- USING TECHNOLOGY TO IMPROVE SERVICE EXPERIENCE
- Self-scanning delivering service improvements
- Pre-pay terminals option
- In-store access to product information databases
- Improving staff levels through back office technology
- BRAND VALUES AND PROPOSITION DEVELOPMENT
- Service ethos of growing importance
- Establishing brand values and reputation
- Monitoring the dynamics of change
- BROADER MARKET ENVIRONMENT
- SERVICE STANDARDS IN THE WIDER CONTEXT
- Is retail better or worse than other sectors?
- Are UK consumers tolerant of bad service or demanding of good service?
- National Customer Service Week - raising the profile of good service
- ICS launched a UK Customer Satisfaction Index in June 2007
- COMPETITION AND GROWTH OF ONLINE LEAVES NO ROOM FOR COMPLACENCY
- Tightening economy likely to make it harder to win spend
- Growing presence of online shopping increases customer options
- AGEING POPULATION AN OPPORTUNITY FOR SERVICE-CENTRIC RETAILERS
- Main source of population growth is the over 45s
- Figure 1: UK population, by age, 2001-11
- Older people appreciate good service and will pay a premium for it
- Older people less inclined to use the Internet and will remain store-focused
- WHO’S INNOVATING
- Tesco “one-in-front” queue busting cameras keeping it ahead
- Predictive monitoring by Tesco will assist queue management
- Asda’s Smiley Squad
- Bhs using customer feedback to recognise staff performance
- Lloydspharmacy automating dispensing services to create staff time for consultation
- Healthy advice
- Selfridges’ Wonder Bar
- Mamas & Papas bumping ahead
- Shopping centre acknowledging good service provision
- MARKET IN CONTEXT
- TESCO
- Customer first ethos at the heart of its proposition
- “One in front” delivered through new technology
- Queues remain a target for attention
- J SAINSBURY
- Principles of recovery
- Recent turnaround based on improving service levels
- Leading by example
- ASDA
- “Common sense” retailing winning new customers
- Warm and Friendly way to service
- Asda’s Smiley Squad
- Self-scan driving service improvements
- MORRISONS
- “The food specialist for everyone”
- Recovery phase being driven by operational efficiency improvements
- Business review highlights in-store service as key attribute
- MARKS & SPENCER
- Service standards an integral element of its brand culture
- Carried away by good service
- Healthy advice
- JOHN LEWIS PARTNERSHIP, INCLUDING WAITROSE
- Unique ownership structure contributes to service culture
- Setting and maintaining high service standards
- Passion for selling
- HOME RETAIL GROUP, INCLUDING ARGOS AND HOMEBASE
- Aiming for high customer service standards within a multi-channel operation
- Leader in use of point of sale technology
- Find & Pick Up and Instant Alert Service
- B&Q
- Lost in space
- Service squads targeting customer queries
- Recognition of its inclusion policies
- WOOLWORTHS
- Self-selection minimal staff contact operating model
- Faith in conga queuing
- Range extensions delivered through in-store ordering
- DSGI (INCLUDING CURRYS.DIGITAL AND PC WORLD)
- Technical focus of these businesses creates strong need for sales and service skills
- Reserving items online for collection from a local store
- PC World launches fourth shopping channel in 2007
- Tech guys go national in July 2007
- Altering the mind set
- COMET
- Best price, best choice, best service
- Deliberate Customer Journey service initiative a key element of brand relaunch
- Advertising campaign focusing on staff training and service standards
- Comet on Call
- BOOTS
- Trust in Boots
- Longer opening hours to deliver enhanced pharmacy services
- Till receipts trigger customer feedback
- IKEA
- Product-led proposition
- Customers remarkably tolerant of low service standards
- Margin for improvement
- Market pressure creating change
- AMAZON
- Pioneer of online retailing and continuing to set high service standards
- Paying for convenience
- Prime numbers
- WHAT CONSUMERS THINK OF SERVICE STANDARDS
- Satisfaction levels generally high but retailers not “wowing” many customers
- Results show extent of opportunities to develop the customer service experience
- Scope for “wowing” more affluent consumers
- Low levels of dissatisfaction characteristic of responsiveness of the industry
- Sizeable element of ABC1 shoppers up for grabs
- Conclusion - no room for complacency
- MAJORITY OF CONSUMERS SATISFIED WITH SERVICE RECEIVED
- Majority of high spending customers are “generally satisfied” with service standards
- Relatively low numbers of “very satisfied” shoppers
- Relatively low numbers of “dissatisfied” customers
- Figure 2: Satisfaction with customer service standards, June 2007
- Who are the most satisfied customers?
- Significant influence of peer group selling
- Stores’ influence on shoppers
- Who tolerates average service standards?
- Yet, more of those in affluent groups also gave negative responses
- Younger affluent shoppers open to persuasion
- Who are the least satisfied customers?
- WHAT CONSUMERS THINK OF SERVICE STANDARDS - DETAILED CONSUMER DEMOGRAPHICS
- Figure 3: Relative levels of satisfaction, by socio-demographic detail, June 2007
- THE MAKINGS OF A GOOD SERVICE EXPERIENCE
- Most desired attributes relate to interaction with staff
- Good product knowledge commands respect and wins sales
- Going the extra mile to answer queries
- Turning an out of stock into an opportunity
- Conclusion - targeting human factors will improve shoppers’ perceptions
- OBSERVING COMMON NICETIES APPEALS MOST
- Satisfaction starts with a smile
- Product knowledge defines staff’s role
- Helpfulness has to show through
- Going the extra mile
- Closing the sale properly creates impetus for repeat visit
- Online environment requires rapid response
- Figure 4: Elements of a good service experience, June 2007
- Good attitude and helpfulness has widespread appeal
- High expectations of product knowledge among the more affluent
- Going the extra mile can win sales from competing channels
- Stores with pleasant staff
- More affluent online users expect prompt reaction to queries
- THE MAKINGS OF A GOOD SERVICE EXPERIENCE - DETAILED CONSUMER DEMOGRAPHICS
- Figure 5: Most important factors contributing to a good service experience, by socio-demographic detail,
- June 2007
- Figure 6: Other factors contributing to a good service experience, by socio-demographic detail, June 2007
- THE MAKINGS OF A BAD SERVICE EXPERIENCE
- Enough of the right people, in the right place, at the right time
- Attitude is everything
- Developing product knowledge, people engagement and communication skills
- Breaking the cycle
- Frequent small initiatives help maintain customer-centric focus
- Conclusion - staff need to know how customers expect them to behave
- ACCURATE STAFF SCHEDULING WILL ADDRESS NEGATIVE ISSUES
- Unopened checkouts when queues are forming is main grievance
- Staff must project a sales as well as service ethos
- Staff need to be visible and accessible on the shop floor
- Access to back up needed to enhance staff knowledge
- Lack of responsiveness a factor for online shoppers
- Figure 7: Elements of a bad service experience, June 2007
- More affluent most sensitive to causes of bad experience
- Staff need to be attentive to older people
-
but must not overdo it
- Men want staff that know about what they are selling
- More affluent families frustrated by lack of product knowledge
- THE MAKINGS OF A BAD SERVICE EXPERIENCE - DETAILED CONSUMER DEMOGRAPHICS
- Figure 8: Most important factors contributing to a bad service experience, by socio-demographic detail, June
- 2007
- Figure 9: Other important factors contributing to a bad service experience, by socio-demographic detail,
- June 2007
- Figure 10: Least important factors contributing to a bad service experience, by socio-demographic detail,
- June 2007
- SERVICE STANDARDS - BEST AND WORST RETAILERS
- Majority of retailers delivering adequate levels of satisfaction
- Modest numbers of satisfied customers suggests scope for improvement
- Marks & Spencer’s advantage likely to increase in future
- Electrical goods retailers have the worst reputation for service
- Conclusion - big impact with small changes
- OVERALL LEVELS OF SATISFACTION MODEST
- Research indicators employed
- Customers of leading retailers are underwhelmed by service standards
- Marks & Spencer marginally outperformed Asda and Tesco
- Marks & Spencer also has the strongest balance of responses
- A relatively small proportion of shoppers experience inconsistent or poor service
- Leading household goods retailers attracted most criticism for poor service
- Four companies have a negative balance
- Figure 11: Retailers rated for giving good and poor service, June 2007
- Those viewing standards favourably reflect regular user characteristics
- Value of further analysis lies in who is not attracted to specific retailers
- Good but not exceptional numbers of regular grocery shoppers rate the service they get as good
- Many are tolerant of indifferent service standards or do not attach importance to them
- Men not as enamoured of service standards of clothing and department stores as women
- Marks & Spencer underperforms among young affluent shoppers
- Women less impressed with household goods retailers’ service standards than men
- Women also less impressed with online retailers’ service standards
- Superdrug has it all to do to attract ABC1 shoppers
- ABC1 families most vociferous about inconsistent and poor service
- Some shoppers are tolerant of poor service
- SERVICE STANDARDS - BEST AND WORST - DETAILED CONSUMER DEMOGRAPHICS
- Figure 12: Grocery retailers’ ratings for consistently good levels of service, by socio-demographic detail,
- June 2007
- Figure 13: Clothing and department stores’ ratings for consistently good levels of service, by sociodemographic
- detail, June 2007
- Figure 14: Household goods retailers’ ratings for consistently good levels of service, by socio-demographic
- detail, June 2007
- Figure 15: Online retailers’ ratings for consistently good levels of service, by socio-demographic detail, June
- 2007
- Figure 16: Health and beauty retailers’ ratings for consistently good levels of service, by socio-demographic
- detail, June 2007
- Figure 17: Retailers’ ratings for inconsistent and poor levels of service, by socio-demographic detail, June
- 2007
- THE IMPACT OF BAD SERVICE
- Bad service changes shopping behaviour
- Strong ripple effect of bad service can be turned to positive effect
- Standards directly affect commercial success
- Conclusion - high business risk posed by bad service makes strong case for investment
- IMPACT SPREADS BEYOND THOSE DIRECTLY AFFECTED
- Direct impact of bad service is significant
- Bad service could cost a retailer half its customers
-
but ripple effect also spreads to friends and beyond
- Considerable credibility gap
- Mixed reaction to online service standards
- Figure 18: Reaction to bad service experiences, June 2007
- More women might defect but more men have actually done so
- ABs and older people more reactive to bad service
- AB families’ extensive networks compound the ripple effect
- Slight bias to ABC1s among those perceiving a credibility gap
- Online attracting younger consumers but frustrating them as well
- THE IMPACT OF BAD SERVICE - DETAILED CONSUMER DEMOGRAPHICS
- Figure 19: Most likely reactions to bad service experience, by socio-demographic detail, June 2007
- Figure 20: Other reactions to bad service experience, by socio-demographic detail, June 2007
- CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS AND THE SERVICE EXPERIENCE
- Putting it right when it goes wrong
- Staff need to be empowered and encouraged to take responsibility
- Right response to right people required
- Conclusion - free feedback needs to be acted on
- PLENTY OF EXPERIENCE OF COMPLAINTS
- Only 20% of respondents have not made a complaint
- Generally good levels of satisfaction with response to complaints
- But many complaints not resolved at first time of asking
- Not all staff using complaints as an opportunity
- Negative approach by staff not widespread but neither is ownership of problem
- Figure 21: Experience of customer complaints, June 2007
- Nine out of ten ABC1 families have complained about a purchase
- ABC1 families have high levels of satisfaction having complained
- ABC1 pre-family and family adults are most dissatisfied with complaints
- CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS - DETAILED CONSUMER DEMOGRAPHICS
- Figure 22: Most common experiences of customer complaints, by socio-demographic detail, June 2007
- Figure 23: Other experiences of customer complaints, by socio-demographic detail, June 2007
- FUTURE AND CONCLUSIONS
- Always room for improvement
- Operational shortcomings main cause of annoyance to customers
- Customers have modest expectations of retail store staff
- Bad service is bad for business
- The future - empowering staff with technology
- The future - delivering good service in a multi-channel world
- APPENDIX: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
|
|