|
|
Home > Communications > Wireless > Components/Equipment
Competing Mobile Device Visions for the US: UMPCs, MIDs, and Smartphones
|
| Published Date:
May 2008
Published By:
In-Stat
Page Count:
39
Order Code:
R97-3133
|
|
|
|
- Executive Summary
- Introduction
- Ultra-Mobile PCs
- Mobile Internet Devices
- Smartphones
- The Smartphone “Mobile Companion”
- Summary
- Current Device Ownership
- The Practice of Carrying Duplicate Devices
- The Issue of Weight of Devices
- What Non-Users Say
- Preferences for New Mobile Data Devices
- Marketing Mix for the New Devices
- What Existing Device Would be Left Once the User Acquired a New Device
- Conclusions about UMPCs, MIDs, Smartphones, and Mobile Companions in the US
- Smartphones
- Smartphones with Mobile Companions
- MIDs
- UMPCs
- Methodology
- Survey Demographics
- Glossary
- Related In-Stat Reports
- List of Tables
- Table 1. Mapping of New Capabilities to the Device Categories
- List of Figures
- Figure 1. US Respondents’ Choice for Best Fit Among UMPCs, MIDs, and Smartphones
- Figure 2. Asus EEE PC
- Figure 3. Nokia N800 Mobile Internet Tablet
- Figure 4. AT&T Tilt Smartphone
- Figure 5. Image of Celio Corporation’s Redfly Smartphone Mobile Companion
- Figure 6. Devices Carried and Owned by US Respondents
- Figure 7. Comparison of Devices Carried Regularly or Just for Special Circumstances
- Figure 8. Business and Personal Use of Devices Carried Regularly by US Respondents
- Figure 9. The Source of Devices Carried by US Respondents
- Figure 10. Reasons Why US Respondents Carry Two or More Wireless Phones
- Figure 11. Reasons Why US Respondents Carry Multiple Computing Devices
- Figure 12. Weight of Devices Carried Regularly by US Respondents When Away From Primary Work Location
- Figure 13. Average Weight, in Pounds, of Devices Carried by US Respondents by Travel Amount
- Figure 14. Frustrations With Current Devices Carried Regularly by US Respondents
- Figure 15. Why US Non-Users of Mobile Data Said They Do Not Currently Carry a Mobile Data Device
- Figure 16. Primary Capability Desired by US Respondents for Mobile Devices
- Figure 17. Reasons US Respondents Were Not Willing to Pay $30 for a 3x Improvement of Battery Performance
- Figure 18. US Respondents’ Choice for Best Fit Among UMPCs, MIDs, and Smartphones
- Figure 19. Sales Channel Preferences Among US Respondents for New Mobile Devices, by Device Category
- Figure 20. Price Expectations Among US Respondents for New Mobile Devices, by Device Category
- Figure 21. Most Common Devices Cited as Being Left After Acquiring New Device by US Respondents by Preference for a UMPC, MID, or Smartphone With and Without a Mobile Companion
- Figure 22. Age Distribution of US Respondents
- Figure 23. Income Distribution for US Respondents
- Figure 24. Travel Amounts for US Respondents
- Figure 25. Job Titles of US Respondents
- Figure 26. Industry of Employers for US Respondents
- Figure 27. Size of Employer of US Respondents
|
Similar Products
• Communications Equipment Retail Market in France
Published Oct 2009 by Verdict Research Ltd
• Wireless Information in Professional Markets 2009-2010
Published Oct 2009 by Simba Information - Reports
• Communications Equipment Retail Market in Austria
Published Oct 2009 by Datamonitor
• Communications Equipment Retail Market in Hungary
Published Oct 2009 by Datamonitor
• Communications Equipment Retail Market in Turkey
Published Oct 2009 by Datamonitor
• Communications Equipment Retail Market in Sweden
Published Oct 2009 by Datamonitor
• Communications Equipment Retail Market in Ireland
Published Oct 2009 by Datamonitor
• Communications Equipment Retail Market in Greece
Published Oct 2009 by Datamonitor
• Communications Equipment Retail Market in Denmark
Published Oct 2009 by Datamonitor
• Communications Equipment Retail Market in Belgium
Published Oct 2009 by Datamonitor
|
|
|
|
0 items
