Industry Research Reports and Market Analysis at MindBranch.com Research Index | Publishers | My Account | Contact Us | About MindBranch
Welcome Guest  (Login/Register) |  0 items
  
Advanced Search > | Tips >
Contact a
Research Assistant

US 800-774-4410
or +1-240-747-3094

Search Assistance >

Home  > Computers and Information Technology  >  Networking  >  Networks

Next-Generation Network Architecture: What and When?


Published Date: January 2008
Published By: Analysys Mason
Order Code: R51-254
 
DescriptionTable of ContentsSimilar
Products

0 Summary
1 NGN upgrades are underway, but outcomes are uncertain
1.1 There are three basic approaches to network transformation
1.2 Most incumbent operators have three explicit reasons for NGNs
1.3 Some incumbent operators have a stronger incentive to re-engineer than others
1.4 Operators hope that heavy investment will deliver less heavily regulated forms of market dominance
2 NGNs both reduce and transform the network cost base
2.1 The capital cost of an NGN can be substantially higher than that of next-generation access
2.2 A single network will result in lower cash costs, but not necessarily lower capex
2.3 Real cost savings are often out of line with long-term plans
2.4 NGNs transform the asset structure of operators
3 Serious doubts remain over the scale of the new revenue for NGN operators
3.1 Different approaches to NGN investment reveal different revenue mixes and different co-dependencies
3.2 Lower underlying costs may damage the unit value of fixed voice
3.3 IPTV may take off in the residential market, but revenue opportunities for telcos’ retail arms may still be limited
3.4 Demand for managed services from SMEs is likely to bring limited revenue growth
3.5 Networked enterprise IT offers revenue growth for players with scale and credibility
3.6 Opportunities for wholesale divisions may be much greater
3.7 NGN’s centralised service delivery runs counter to recent trends
4 Regulation threatens the benefits to incumbents of NGNs
4.1 A set of increasingly familiar problems surrounds NGAs
4.2 Operators may have to hand on NGN cost savings to competitors, in the form of lower interconnect charges
4.3 Structural and functional separation raise further complications
4.4 The vertically integrated model persists
5 NGNs are a better investment than NGAs
5.1 NGNs reduce costs, but growth in business services revenue requires focused execution
5.2 NGA-only approaches are focused too closely on defending a share of a low-opportunity market
5.3 Fibre is the ultimate goal, but core transformation is the priority
Actions
Companies discussed in this report: AT&T, BT, Deutsche Telekom, eircom, France Telecom, KPN, Slovak Telecom, Telecom Italia, Telstra, Verizon.


List of Figures and Tables
Figure 1.1: IP MPLS overlay for fixed voice (partial PSTN replacement): before and after
Figure 1.2: Fixed network evolution: current situation and strategy of selected incumbent operators
Figure 1.3: Simplified overview of legacy overlays
Figure 1.4: Simplified overview of BT’s 21CN switching and transmission
Figure 1.5: Simplified overview of Deutsche Telekom’s FTTN network
Figure 1.6: Simplified overview of KPN’s next-generation switching and transmission
Figure 1.7: Average spend per minute and volume of voice calls on fixed and mobile networks in Western Europe
Figure 1.8: Major European incumbents’ exposure to fixed voice
Figure 1.9: Operating margins of retail fixed divisions of major European incumbent operators
Figure 2.1: FTEs in BT Group, by division, FY2003/4 and FY2006/7
Figure 2.2: Fixed switched voice volume as a proportion of total fixed and mobile switched voice
Table 3.1: Revenue impact of different next-generation scenarios
Figure 3.1: A typical NGN service-delivery architecture
Figure 5.1: Key financial outcomes of an NGN-only implementation
Figure 5.2: Main revenue streams from an NGN-only implementation
Figure 5.3: Key financial outcomes of an NGN-only implementation for an operator with lower IT revenue
Figure 5.4: Key financial outcomes of an NGA-only implementation
Figure 5.5: Main revenue streams from an NGA-only implementation
Figure 5.6: Key financial outcomes of an NGA-plus-NGN implementation
Figure 5.7: Main revenue streams from an NGA-plus-NGN implementation
Figure 5.8: Key financial outcomes of an NGA-plus-NGN implementation in which the NGN element is delayed until Year 4

Similar Products
ATM Surcharging in the US Market: The Growth of National Banking Networks Will Hasten Its Decline
Published Nov 2008 by TowerGroup


Network Solutions & Strategies Perspective / Vol. 1, Issue 14
Published Nov 2008 by Pyramid Research


Web Smart Switches Gain Traction With SMBs Worldwide
Published Nov 2008 by In-Stat


The Taiwanese Optical Disk Drive Industry, 3Q 2008
Published Oct 2008 by Market Intelligence Center


Impact of the Financial And Economic Turmoil: Will Outsourcing and Managed Services Be the Mavericks in the ICT World?
Published Oct 2008 by IDC


UK public sector shared services: the opportunity 2007-2012
Published Oct 2008 by Ovum Plc


Telecom 2020: Transformation Strategies
Published Oct 2008 by TelecomView


OSS/BSS Market 2007-2010
Published Oct 2008 by Infiniti Research Limited


Network Management & Network Consulting & Integration Services Market 2007-2010 - Bundled Report
Published Oct 2008 by Infiniti Research Limited


Japan Network Disk Market Update: Increasing Capacity Needs of Small and Medium Businesses
Published Oct 2008 by IDC




 


Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Site Map | Return Policy | Help FAQs
Copyright © 1999-2008, All Rights Reserved, MindBranch.com
Trust-e Logo
Phone: 800-774-4410 (US) or +1-240-747-3094 (Int'l)
Hours: 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. EST Monday through Friday
Email: support@mindbranch.com