|
|
Home > Computers and Information Technology > Computer Technology & Equipment > Storage Devices
ILM and Data Classification
|
|
- INTRODUCTION
- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- 1- PROFILES - Site Profiles
- Storage Profiles
- 2- MANAGEMENT
- Storage Management
- Budgets and VARs
- 3- ILM
- 4- DATA CLASSIFICATION
- 5- TIERED STORAGE
- 6- SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
- 7- AUTHOR’S PROFILE
- 8- OTHER PERIPHERAL CONCEPTS’ REPORTS
- LIST OF FIGURES
- 0- Executive Summary
- 0.1. QS2. Company Annual Revenue
0.2. QS2. Company Revenue Selected Population for Full Survey
0.3. QS9a. Total Raw Disk Capacity in the company Screening Survey- Answers with an Opinion Only
0.4. Q4a. Disk Capacity Full Survey- All Answers
0.5. QS3. Number of Employees All Respondents- Screening Survey
0.6. 2007- Number of Company Employees vs Disk Capacity
0.7. QS4. Respondent Distribution by Industry Total Population -Screener
0.8. 2007- Industry versus Disk Capacity Screening Survey
0.9. Q13. What is your total yearly IT budget for the company?
0.10. Q10. Priorities in dealing With Storage
0.11. 2007- Information Lifecycle Management (ILM)
0.12. Q12d. ILM Plans By Disk Capacity Range Screening Survey - Respondents with an opinion
0.13. 2007- ILM steps -Level of achievement
0.14. Percent of IT budget dedicated to ILM versus Levels of Corporate IT budgets
0.15. 2007- Reasons for Implementing ILM
0.16. 2007- Services Combined with an ILM Offering Respondents with an opinion only
0.17. 2007- Rating ILM Features Respondents with an opinion only
0.18. 2007- ILM Vendors Respondents with an opinion only
0.19. 2007- Data Classification status and plan Screening Survey
0.20. QS12b. Data Classification Status and Plans Screener - Answers with an Opinion Only
0.21. 2007 - How many Classification levels have you identified?
0.22. 2007- What Applications do you Classify? Respondents with an opinion only
0.23. 2007- Important Factors in Classifying Data Respondents with an opinion only
0.24. 2007- Rating Data Classification Features Respondents with an opinion only
0.25. 2007- Data Classification Vendors Respondents with an opinion only
0.26. 2007- Automated Tiered Storage
0.27. Q12a. Tiered Storage Status and Plans Answers with an Opinion Only
0.28. Tiered Storage- Reasons for Implementation Respondents with an opinion only
0.29. 2007- Services Offered with Tiered Storage Respondents with an opinion only
0.30. 2007- Tiered Storage Vendors
- 1- PROFILES
- 1.1. SITE PROFILES
- 1.2. QS2. Company Annual Revenue
- 1.3. QS2. Company Revenue Selected Population for Full Survey
- 1.4. QS3. Number of Employees All Respondents- Screening Survey
- 1.5. QS3. Number of Employees Selected Population
- 1.6. QS4. Respondent Distribution by Industry Total Population -Screener
- 1.7. QS4. Respondent Distribution by Industry Selected Population
- 1.8. QS1. Areas of Responsibility All Screening Respondents
- 1.9. QS1. Areas of Responsibility Selected Population
- 1.10. QS5. Total Number of Servers Selected Population
- 1.11. QS6. Total Number of Workstations Selected Population
- 1.12. QS5. How many servers of each type does your company have?
- 1.13. QS6. How many servers From each Vendor does your company have?Screening Survey
- 1.14. QS6. How many servers From each Vendor does your company have? Selected Population
- 1.15. Storage profiles
- 1.16. QS9a. Total Raw Disk Capacity in the company Screening Survey- Answers with an Opinion Only
- 1.17. Q4a. Disk Capacity Full Survey- Excludes Don’t Know
- 1.18. Q5a. Annual Growth Rate of Disk Capacity
- 1.19. Q3a. Number of Employees vs Disk Capacity
- 1.20. QS4. Industry versus Disk Capacity Screening Survey
- 1.21. Q8. Type of storage arrays (or vendor) used
- 1.22. QS10. Disk Connection to Various Operating Systems Respondents With an Opinion only
- 1.23. QS10. Disk Connection to Windows Respondents With an Opinion only
- 1.24. QS10. Disk Connection to Linux Respondents With an Opinion only
- 1.25. QS10. Disk Connection to UNIX Respondents With an Opinion only
- 1.26. QS10. Disk Connection to Proprietary OS Respondents With an Opinion only
- 1.27. QS10. Disk Connection to Mainframes Respondents With an Opinion only
- 2- MANAGEMENT
- 2.1. Storage Management Issues
- 2.2. Q10. Priorities in dealing With Storage
- 2.3. Q10. Priorities in dealing With Storage Tiers 3 Sites with Disk Capacity 51-200 TB
- 2.4. 2006 Report Screener Survey, What are the Key Challenges in Managing your Storage Environment?
- 2.5. Q11. Problem Areas in dealing With Storage
- 2.6. Q11. Problem Areas in dealing With Storage
- 2.7. Q11. Problem Areas - Security By capacity Tiers
- 2.8. Q12. Are you experiencing performance bottlenecks?
- 2.9. Q12. Are you experiencing performance bottlenecks? By capacity Tiers
- 2.10. Budgets, VARs
- 2.11. Q13. What is your total yearly IT budget for the company?
- 2.12. Q99. What percent of you IT budget have you dedicated to ILM?
- 2.13. Q99. Percent of IT budget dedicated to ILM/HSM versus Total Budget
- 2.14. Q15 What Percent of Deployment of Storage is Done by
- 2.15. Q15 What Percent of Deployment of Storage is Done by the Vendor
- 2.16. Q15 What Percent of Deployment of Storage is Done by VARs
- 2.17. Q16. At What Level of Management is the Decision Made for Purchasing
- 3.1. ILM
-
- 3.2. QS12c. ILM Status and Plans Screening Survey- All Respondents
- 3.3. QS12c. ILM Status and Plans Screening Survey- Respondents With an Opinion only
- 3.4. QS12c. ILM Plans By Corporate Disk Capacity Range
- 3.5. QS12c. ILM Plans by Department Capacity Ranges All Respondents
- 3.6. QS12d. ILM Plans By Disk Capacity Range Screening Survey - Respondents with an opinion
- 3.7. QS12c. ILM Plans by Number of Employees
- 3.8. QS12c. ILM Plans by Number of Employees Without Respondents who don’t know what it is
- 3.9. QS12c. ILM Plans by Number of Servers
- 3.10. Q95. ILM steps - Level of achievement
- 3.11. Q96. ILM Implementation status and plan Full Survey - Answers with an opinion only
- 3.12. Q13c. Rate the Importance of ILM Screening Survey
- 3.13. Q13c. Rate the Importance of ILM Screening Survey- By capacity Range
- 3.14. Q98. For what percent of your data do you, or will you have ILM?
- 3.15. Q99. What percent of you IT budget have you dedicated to ILM?
- 3.16. Q100. Criteria/Reasons in Selecting ILM
- 3.17. Q97. Why not implement ILM?
- 3.18. Q101. Rating ILM Features Respondents with an opinion only
- 3.19. Q102 Services Combined with an ILM Offering Respondents with an opinion only
- 3.20. Q103. ILM Vendors Respondents with an opinion only
- 3.21. Q103 ILM Vendors Responses exclude IBM. HP, EMC and Symantec
- 4.1. 4- DATA CLASSIFICATION
- 4.2. QS12b. Data Classification status and plan Screening Survey
- 4.3. QS12b. Data Classification Status and Plans Screener - Answers with an Opinion Only
- 4.4. QS12b. Data Classification Plans by Department Capacity Ranges All Respondents
- 4.5. QS12b. Data Classification Plans by Department Capacity Ranges Respondents With an Opinion Only
- 4.6. Q107. Rate the Importance of Data Classification
- 4.7. Q13b. Rate the Importance of Data Classification Screening Survey- By capacity Range
- 4.8. Q105. For what percent of your data do you have Data Classification?
- 4.9. Q106. What percent of you IT budget have you dedicated to Data Classification in 2006
- 4.10. Q106. What percent of you IT budget will you dedicate to Data Classification?
- 4.11. Q108. Reasons for Implementing Data Classification Respondents with an opinion only
- 4.12. Q109 How many Classification levels have you identified?
- 4.13. Q110. Important Factors/Reasons for Classifying Data Respondents with an opinion only
- 4.14. Q113. Rating Data Classification Features Respondents with an opinion only
- 4.15. Q112. What Applications do you Classify? Respondents with an opinion only
- 4.16. Q114. What Classification Solution? Respondents with an opinion only
- 4.17. Q116. Data Classification Vendors Respondents with an opinion only
- 4.18. Q116. Data Classification Vendors Without IBM, HP, EMC and NetApp
- 5.1. AUTOMATED TIERED STORAGE
- 5.2. Q12a. Tiered Storage Status and Plans
- 5.3. Q12a. Tiered Storage Status and Plans Answers with an Opinion Only
- 5.4. QS12a. Tiered storage Plans by Department Capacity Ranges All Respondents
- 5.5. QS12a. Tiered storage Plans by Department Capacity Ranges Respondents with an opinion only
- 5.6. QS13a. Rate the Importance of Automated Tiered Storage Screening Survey
- 5.7. Q120. Factors Influencing Tiered Storage Choice Respondents with an opinion only
- 5.8. Q121. Services Offered with Tiered Storage Respondents with an opinion only
- 5.9. Q122. Tiered Storage Vendors
- 5.10. Q122. Tiered Storage Vendors Without IBM, HP, EMC and NetApp
|
Similar Products
• Computer Storage Device Manufacturing Industry in the U.S. and its Foreign Trade
Published Nov 2008 by Supplier Relations US, LLC
• Prerecorded Compact Disc (except Software), Tape, and Record Reproducing Industry in the U.S. and its Foreign Trade
Published Nov 2008 by Supplier Relations US, LLC
• Worldwide Branded Tape 1H08 Vendor Analysis
Published Oct 2008 by IDC
• Selling Storage Solutions in Canada: Matching Customer Need with Integrated Solutions
Published Oct 2008 by IDC
• The Taiwanese Optical Disk Drive Industry, 3Q 2008
Published Oct 2008 by Market Intelligence Center
• Recordable Media Manufacturing in the US - Industry Market Research Report
Published Oct 2008 by IBISWorld
• SVP.04: Compellent Delivers Dynamic Tiered Storage That Reduces Companies' Carbon Footprint
Published Oct 2008 by IDC
• Storage Hardware & Storage Management Services Market 2007-2010 - Bundled Report
Published Oct 2008 by Infiniti Research Limited
• Perspectives on the HP ESS EMEA Analyst Summit 2008
Published Oct 2008 by IDC
• Japan Network Disk Market Update: Increasing Capacity Needs of Small and Medium Businesses
Published Oct 2008 by IDC
|
|
|
|
0 items
