The Survey of College Website Management Practices: Industry Research Report

The Survey of College Website Management Practices

Published Date: November 2007

Published By: Primary Research Group

Page Count: 176

Order Code: R180-117

Questions About This Report

E-mail a Colleague

Printable Page

Fax Your Order

Description

Table of Contents

Search Inside
this Report

Similar
Products

PARTICIPANTS
SUMMARY OF MAIN FINDINGS: Date of Establishment of the Webmaster Position; Centralized vs. Decentralized Website Governance Structure; Number of Individuals Allowed to Edit or Insert Content into the Website; Content-Orientation vs. IT-Orientation in How Webmasters View Their Role; College Department to which the Webmaster Reports; Sources that Fund the College Web Staff; Separate College Website Software Budget; College Spending on Website Consultants; Spending on Salaries for Web Staff; Percentage of Web Staff Represented by Union Labor Agreements; Who is Authorized to Enter Content to the Website?; The Institutional Catalysts for Instituting Changes to the Website; Number of Pages Actively Managed by the Webmaster; Management of Departmental Home Pages; Staffing the Central College Web Staff; Extent of Content Contributions to the Website from Various Academic and Administrative Units of the College; Number of Visits to the College Home Page; Use of Content Management Systems; Use of Style Guides for Web Submissions; Requirements to Conform to a Single Graphic Style; Provision of Web Page Templates; Frequency of Major Web Page Redesigns; Frequency of Review of Departmental or Divisional Websites by the College Webmaster; Website End User Training; Gaining Cooperation from End Users for New Website Initiatives; Policies on Allowing Postings of Research, Blogs & Special Projects; Use of Social Networking and other Popular Internet Sites; Use of Website Analytics Packages; Favored Server Platforms; Favored Scripting Languages; Favored Portal Software; Use of Personal Computers & Workstations by the Web Staff; Web Communications During A Campus Crisis
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SAMPLE: Table A: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Full Time Equivalent Student Enrollment, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table B: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Full Time Equivalent Student Enrollment, Broken Out by Type of College; Table C: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Full Time Equivalent Student Enrollment, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment
SECTION #1: DEGREE OF CENTRALIZATION OF WEBSITE CONTROL: Table #1-1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Years that the College has had a Central Webmaster; Table #1-2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Years that the College has had a Central Webmaster, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #1-3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Years that the College has had a Central Webmaster, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #1-4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Years that the College has had a Central Webmaster, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #1-5: Percentage of Colleges with a Centralized or Decentralized Web Governance Structure; Table #1-6: Percentage of Colleges with a Centralized or Decentralized Web Governance Structure, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #1-7: Percentage of Colleges with a Centralized or Decentralized Web Governance Structure, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #1-8: Percentage of Colleges with a Centralized or Decentralized Web Governance Structure, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #1-9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Individuals Outside of the Central Web Staff that Enter Content to the College Website in a Semester; Table #1-10: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Individuals Outside of the Central Web Staff that Enter Content to the College Website in a Semester, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #1-11: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Individuals Outside of the Central Web Staff that Enter Content to the College Website in a Semester, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #1-12: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Individuals Outside of the Central Web Staff that Enter Content to the College Website in a Semester, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #1-13: Webmasters’ Primary Website Responsibility; Table #1-14: Webmasters’ Primary Website Responsibility, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #1-15: Webmasters’ Primary Website Responsibility, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #1-16: Webmasters’ Primary Website Responsibility, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #1-17: Departments to which the Webmaster Reports; Table #1-18: Departments to which the Webmaster Reports, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #1-19: Departments to which the Webmaster Reports, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #1-20: Departments to which the Webmaster Reports, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment
SECTION #2: FUNDING THE COLLEGE WEB STAFF: Table #2-1: Web Staffs that Receive Funding from the Central College Administration; Table #2-2: Web Staffs that Receive Funding from the Central College Administration, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #2-3: Web Staffs that Receive Funding from the Central College Administration, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #2-4: Web Staffs that Receive Funding from the Central College Administration, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #2-5: Web Staffs that Receive Funding from Specific Academic Departments; Table #2-6: Web Staffs that Receive Funding from Specific Academic Departments, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #2-7: Web Staffs that Receive Funding from Specific Academic Departments, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #2-8: Web Staffs that Receive Funding from Specific Academic Departments, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #2-9: Web Staffs that Receive Funding from Campus Services & Functional Units; Table #2-10: Web Staffs that Receive Funding from Campus Services & Functional Units, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #2-11: Web Staffs that Receive Funding from Campus Services & Functional Units, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #2-12: Web Staffs that Receive Funding from Campus Services & Functional Units, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #2-13: Web Staffs that Receive Funding from Student Technology Fees; Table #2-14: Web Staffs that Receive Funding from Student Technology Fees, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #2-15: Web Staffs that Receive Funding from Student Technology Fees, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #2-16: Web Staffs that Receive Funding from Student Technology Fees, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment
SECTION #3: THE COLLEGE WEBSITE BUDGET: Table #3-1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum College Budget for the Central Website (in $); Table #3-2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum College Budget for the Central Website, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges (in $); Table #3-3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum College Budget for the Central Website, Broken Out by Type of College (in $); Table #3-4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum College Budget for the Central Website, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #3-5: Percentage of Central Web Staffs that have their own Software Budget; Table #3-6: Percentage of Central Web Staffs that have their own Software Budget, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #3-7: Percentage of Central Web Staffs that have their own Software Budget, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #3-8: Percentage of Central Web Staffs that have their own Software Budget, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment
SECTION #4: SPENDING FOR WEBSITE STAFF & CONSULTANTS IN THE PAST YEAR: Table #4-1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum College Spending for Website Consultants in the Past Year (in $); Table #4-2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum College Spending for Website Consultants in the Past Year (in $), Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #4-3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum College Spending for Website Consultants in the Past Year (in $), Broken Out by Type of College; Table #4-4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum College Spending for Website Consultants in the Past Year (in $), Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #4-5: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Total Spending on Salaries for Web Staff Whose Primary Responsibility was Developing, Maintaining or Expanding the College Central Website (in $); Table #4-6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Total Spending on Salaries for Web Staff Whose Primary Responsibility was Developing, Maintaining or Expanding the College Central Website (in $), Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #4-7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Total Spending on Salaries for Web Staff Whose Primary Responsibility was Developing, Maintaining or Expanding the College Central Website (in $), Broken Out by Type of College; Table #4-8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Total Spending on Salaries for Web Staff Whose Primary Responsibility was Developing, Maintaining or Expanding the College Central Website (in $), Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #4-9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Web Staff Represented Through Union Agreements; Table #4-10: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Web Staff Represented Through Union Agreements, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #4-11: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Web Staff Represented Through Union Agreements, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #4-12: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Web Staff Represented Through Union Agreements, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment
SECTION #5: INVESTMENT IN NEW WEB PROGRAMS: Table #5-1: How Often Does the College Invest in New Web Programs?; Table #5-2: How Often Does the College Invest in New Web Programs?, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #5-3: How Often Does the College Invest in New Web Programs?, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #5-4: How Often Does the College Invest in New Web Programs?, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #5-5: Percentage of Colleges that have Invested in New Development Software over the Past Three Years; Table #5-6: Percentage of Colleges that Have Invested in Application Systems Within the Past Three Years; Table #5-7: Percentage of Colleges that Have Invested in Application Systems Within the Past Three Years, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #5-8: Percentage of Colleges that Have Invested in Application Systems Within the Past Three Years, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #5-9: Percentage of Colleges that Have Invested in Web Technology Infrastructure Within the Past Three Years; Table #5-10: Percentage of Colleges that Have Invested in Web Technology Infrastructure Within the Past Three Year, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #5-11: Percentage of Colleges that Have Invested in Web Technology Infrastructure Within the Past Three Years, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #5-12: Percentage of Colleges that Have Invested in Web Technology Infrastructure Within the Past Three Years, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #5-13: Percentage of Colleges that Have Developed Home-Grown Web Applications Within the Past Three Years; Table #5-14: Percentage of Colleges that Have Developed Home-Grown Web Applications Within the Past Three Years, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #5-15: Percentage of Colleges that Have Developed Home-Grown Web Applications Within the Past Three Years, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #5-16: Percentage of Colleges that Have Developed Home-Grown Web Applications Within the Past Three Years, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment
SECTION #6: WHO IS AUTHORIZED TO ENTER CONTENT TO THE WEBSITE WITHOUT PRIOR CLEARANCE FROM THE WEBMASTER?: Table #6-1: Percentage of Public Affairs/College Marketing Departments Able to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster; Table #6-2: Percentage of Public Affairs/College Marketing Departments Able to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #6-3: Percentage of Public Affairs/College Marketing Departments Able to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #6-4: Percentage of Public Affairs/College Marketing Departments Able to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #6-5: Percentage of Admissions Departments Able to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster; Table #6-6: Percentage of Admissions Departments Able to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #6-7: Percentage of Admissions Departments Able to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #6-8: Percentage of Admissions Departments Able to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #6-9: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Various Academic Departments to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster; Table #6-10: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Various Academic Departments to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #6-11: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Various Academic Departments to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #6-12: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Various Academic Departments to Make Content Changes their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #6-13: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Departmental Webmasters to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster; Table #6-14: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Departmental Webmasters to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #6-15: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Departmental Webmasters to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #6-16: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Departmental Webmasters to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #6-17: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Academic Administrative Division Webmasters to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Central College Webmaster; Table #6-18: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Academic Administrative Division Webmasters to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Central College Webmaster, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #6-19: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Academic Administrative Division Webmasters to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Central College Webmaster, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #6-20: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Academic Administrative Division Webmasters to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Central College Webmaster, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #6-21: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Deans to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster; Table #6-22: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Deans to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #6-23: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Deans to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #6-24: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Deans to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #6-25: Percentage of Colleges Allowing the College Food Service to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster; Table #6-26: Percentage of Colleges Allowing the College Food Service to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #6-27: Percentage of Colleges Allowing the College Food Service to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #6-28: Percentage of Colleges Allowing the College Food Service to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #6-29: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Other Non-Academic Administrative Departments to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster; Table #6-30: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Other Non-Academic Administrative Departments to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #6-31: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Other Non-Academic Administrative Departments to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #6-32: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Other Non-Academic Administrative Departments to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #6-33: Percentage of Adult Education Departments Able to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster; Table #6-34: Percentage of Adult Education Departments Able to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #6-35: Percentage of Adult Education Departments Able to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #6-36: Percentage of Adult Education Departments Able to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #6-37: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Student Blogs on the College Website; Table #6-38: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Student Blogs on the College Website, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #6-39: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Student Blogs on the College Website, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #6-40: Percentage of Colleges Allowing Student Blogs on the College Website, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #6-41: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Student Bloggers on the College Website to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster; Table #6-42: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Student Bloggers on the College Website to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #6-43: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Student Bloggers on the College Website to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #6-44: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Student Bloggers on the College Website to Make Content Changes to their Sections of the Website without Prior Clearance from the Webmaster, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #6-45: Who Does Data Input on Departmental Websites?; Table #6-46: Who Does Data Input on Departmental Websites?, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #6-47: Who Does Data Input on Departmental Websites?, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #6-48: Who Does Data Input on Departmental Websites?, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment
SECTION #7: INSTITUTIONAL CATALYSTS FOR CHANGING THE WEBSITE: Table #7-1: Most Important Person Responsible for Initiating Changes to the Website; Table #7-2: Most Important Person Responsible for Initiating Changes to the Website, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #7-3: Most Important Person Responsible for Initiating Changes to the Website, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #7-4: Most Important Person Responsible for Initiating Changes to the Website, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #7-5: Department that Heads Major Website Upgrades; Table #7-6: Department that Heads Major Website Upgrades, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #7-7: Department that Heads Major Website Upgrades, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #7-8: Department that Heads Major Website Upgrades, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment
SECTION #8: NUMBER AND TYPE OF WEB PAGES MANAGED BY THE WEBMASTER & WEB STAFF: Table #8-1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Website Pages Managed by the Webmaster; Table #8-2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Website Pages Managed by the Webmaster, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #8-3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Website Pages Managed by the Webmaster, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #8-4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Website Pages Managed by the Webmaster, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #8-5: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Pages on the College Website; Table #8-6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Pages on the College Website, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #8-7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Pages on the College Website, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #8-8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Pages on the College Website, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #8-9: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage the College Home Page; Table #8-10: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage the College Home Page, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #8-11: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage the College Home Page, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #8-12: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage the College Home Page, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #8-13: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage at Least Some Departmental Pages; Table #8-14: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage at Least Some Departmental Pages, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #8-15: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage at Least Some Departmental Pages, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #8-16: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage at Least Some Departmental Pages, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #8-17: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage All Departmental Pages; Table #8-18: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage All Departmental Pages, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #8-19: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage All Departmental Pages, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #8-20: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage All Departmental Pages, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #8-21: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage Project Pages; Table #8-22: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage Project Pages, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #8-23: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage Project Pages, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #8-24: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage Project Pages, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #8-25: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage Other Non-Departmental Pages; Table #8-26: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage Other Non-Departmental Pages, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #8-27: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage Other Non-Departmental Pages, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #8-28: Percentage of Central Webmasters that Manage Other Non-Departmental Pages, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment
SECTION #9: STAFFING THE COLLEGE WEBSITE: Table #9-1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Webmasters for Information Technology; Table #9-2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Webmasters for Information Technology, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #9-3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Webmasters for Information Technology, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #9-4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Webmasters for Information Technology, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #9-5: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Webmasters for Content; Table #9-6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Webmasters for Content, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #9-7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Webmasters for Content, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #9-8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Webmasters for Content, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #9-9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Web Architects; Table #9-10: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Web Architects, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #9-11: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Web Architects, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #9-12: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Web Architects, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #9-13: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Web Designers; Table #9-14: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Web Designers, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #9-15: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Web Designers, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #9-16: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Web Designers, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #9-17: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Web Developers; Table #9-18: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Web Developers, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #9-19: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Web Developers, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #9-20: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Web Developers, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #9-21: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Web Application Developers; Table #9-22: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Web Application Developers, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #9-23: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Web Application Developers, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #9-24: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Web Application Developers, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #9-25: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Information Architects; Table #9-26: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Information Architects, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #9-27: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Information Architects, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #9-28: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Information Architects, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #9-29: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Web Editors; Table #9-30: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Web Editors, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #9-31: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Web Editors, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #9-32: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Web Editors, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #9-33: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Graphic Designers; Table #9-34: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Graphic Designers, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #9-35: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Graphic Designers, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #9-36: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Graphic Designers, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #9-37: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Graphic Designers, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #9-38: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Hardware Systems Administrative Staff Size of Hardware Systems Administrators; Table #9-39: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #9-40: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Hardware Systems Administrators, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #9-41: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Hardware Systems Administrators, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #9-42: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Hardware Systems Administrators, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #9-43: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Network Systems Administrators; Table #9-44: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Network Systems Administrators, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #9-45: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Network Systems Administrators, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #9-46: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Network Systems Administrators, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #9-47: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size of Network Systems Administrators, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #9-48: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Systems Engineers; Table #9-49: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Systems Engineers, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #9-50: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Systems Engineers, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #9-51: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Systems Engineers, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #9-52: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Database Architects; Table #9-53: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Database Architects, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #9-54: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Database Architects, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #9-55: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Size for Database Architects, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #9-56: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Students Employed by Web Staff; Table #9-57: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Students Employed by Web Staff, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #9-58: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Students Employed by Web Staff, Broken Out by Type of College; Table 9-59: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Students Employed by Web Staff, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment
SECTION #10: QUANTITY OF CONTENT CONTRIBUTED TO THE COLLEGE WEBSITE BY VARIOUS SPECIFIC ACADEMIC DEPARTMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES: Table #10-1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Public Affairs or College Marketing; Table #10-2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Public Affairs or College Marketing, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #10-3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Public Affairs or College Marketing, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #10-4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Public Affairs or College Marketing, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #10-5: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Public Affairs or College Marketing, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #10-6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Student Recruitment or Admissions; Table #10-7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Student Recruitment or Admissions, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #10-8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Student Recruitment or Admissions, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #10-9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Student Recruitment or Admissions, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #10-10: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Academic Departments; Table #10-11: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Academic Departments, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #10-12: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Academic Departments, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #10-13: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Academic Departments, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #10-14: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Academic Departments, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #10-15: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Non-Academic Departments not Previously Cited; Table #10-16: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Non-Academic Departments not Previously Cited, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #10-17: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Non-Academic Departments not Previously Cited, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #10-18: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Non-Academic Departments not Previously Cited, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #10-19: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Non-Academic Departments not Previously Cited, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #10-20: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Student Organizations; Table #10-21: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Student Organizations, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #10-22: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Student Organizations, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #10-23: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Student Organizations, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #10-24: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Rating for Number of Web Pages Contributed by Student Organizations, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment
SECTION #11: STATISITCS ON WEB TRAFFIC TO THE COLLEGE WEBSITE: Table #11-1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Monthly Visits to the Home Page; Table #11-2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Monthly Visits to the Home Page, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #11-3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Monthly Visits to the Home Page, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #11-4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Monthly Visits to the Home Page, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #11-5: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Monthly Page Visits to the Admissions Page; Table #11-6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Monthly Page Visits to the Admissions Page, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #11-7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Monthly Page Visits to the Admissions Page, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #11-8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Monthly Page Visits to the Admissions Page, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #11-9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Monthly Page Visits to Academic School, Department Sites; Table #11-10: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Monthly Page Visits to Academic School, Department Sites, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #11-11: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Monthly Page Visits to Academic School, Department Sites, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #11-12: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Monthly Page Visits to Academic School, Department Sites, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #11-13: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Annual Page Visits to Academic School, Department Sites; Table #11-14: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Annual Page Visits to Academic School, Department Sites, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #11-15: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Annual Page Visits to Academic School, Department Sites, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #11-16: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Annual Page Visits to Academic School, Department Sites, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #11-17: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Page Visits to the Main Web Server Per Month; Table #11-18: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Page Visits to the Main Web Server Per Month, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #11-19: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Page Visits to the Main Web Server Per Month, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #11-20: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Page Visits to the Main Web Server Per Month, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #11-21: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Page Visits to the Main Web Server Per Year; Table #11-22: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Page Visits to the Main Web Server Per Year, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #11-23: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Page Visits to the Main Web Server Per Year, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #11-24: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Page Visits to the Main Web Server Per Year, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #11-25: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Visits to the Home Page Per Year; Table #11-26: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Visits to the Home Page Per Year, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #11-27: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Visits to the Home Page Per Year, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #11-28: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Visits to the Home Page Per Year, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment
SECTION #12: USE OF CONTENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: Table #12-1: Percentage of Colleges that use a Content Management System for the Home and Other Central Pages; Table #12-2: Percentage of Colleges that use a Content Management System for the Home and Other Central Pages, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #12-3: Percentage of Colleges that use a Content Management System for the Home and Other Central Pages, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #12-4: Percentage of Colleges that use a Content Management System for the Home and Other Central Pages, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #12-5: Percentage of Colleges that use a Content Management System for Departmental Pages; Table #12-6: Percentage of Colleges that use a Content Management System for Departmental Pages, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #12-7: Percentage of Colleges that use a Content Management System for Departmental Pages, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #12-8: Percentage of Colleges that use a Content Management System for Departmental Pages, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #12-9: Percentage of Colleges that use a Content Management System for Other Website Pages not Previously Specified; Table #12-10: Percentage of Colleges that use a Content Management System for Other Website Pages not Previously Specified, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #12-11: Percentage of Colleges that use a Content Management System for Other Website Pages not Previously Specified, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #12-12: Percentage of Colleges that use a Content Management System for Other Website Pages not Previously Specified, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #12-13: Percentage of Colleges that use a Content Management System for Other Website Pages not Previously Specified, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #12-14: Does the Webmaster Recommend Using a Content Management System for the Entire College?; Table #12-15: Does the Webmaster Recommend Using a Content Management System for the Entire College?, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #12-16: Does the Webmaster Recommend Using a Content Management System for the Entire College?, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #12-17: Does the Webmaster Recommend Using a Content Management System for the Entire College?, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment
SECTION #13: DEGREE OF UNIFORMITY OF STYLE OF COLLEGE WEB PAGES: Table #13-1: Does the College Have an Official Style Guide?; Table #13-2: Does the College Have an Official Style Guide?, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #13-3: Does the College Have an Official Style Guide?, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #13-4: Does the College Have an Official Style Guide?, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #13-5: Does the College Require All College Websites to Conform to a Single Graphic Style?; Table #13-6: Does the College Require All College Websites to Conform to a Single Graphic Style?, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #13-7: Does the College Require All College Websites to Conform to a Single Graphic Style?, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #13-8: Does the College Require All College Websites to Conform to a Single Graphic Style?, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #13-9: Percentage of Webmasters that Provide Web Page Templates; Table #13-10: Percentage of Webmasters that Provide Web Page Templates, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #13-11: Percentage of Webmasters that Provide Web Page Templates, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #13-12: Percentage of Webmasters that Provide Web Page Templates, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment
SECTION #14: DATE OF LAST MAJOR WEBSITE REDESIGN: Table #14-1: Date of Last Major Website Re-Design; Table #14-2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Date of Last Major Website Re-Design, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #14-3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Date of Last Major Website Re-Design, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #14-4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Date of Last Major Website Re-Design, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #14-5: Percentage of Colleges that Are Implementing a Major Website Redesign This Year; Table #14-6: Percentage of Colleges that Are Implementing a Major Website Redesign This Year, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #14-7: Percentage of Colleges that Are Implementing a Major Website Redesign This Year, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #14-8: Percentage of Colleges that Are Implementing a Major Website Redesign This Year, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #14-9: Frequency of Scheduled Reviews of Department or Division Sites Within the Main Website; Table #14-10: Frequency of Scheduled Reviews of Department or Division Sites Within the Main Website, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #14-11: Frequency of Scheduled Reviews of Department or Division Sites Within the Main Website, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #14-12: Frequency of Scheduled Reviews of Department or Division Sites Within the Main Website, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment
SECTION #15: PROVIDING TRAINING TO END USERS OF THE WEBSITE: Table # 15-1: What is the Most Important Way that you Provide Training to Faculty, Staff or Students Who Manage Websites or Enter Content?; Table #15-2: What is the Most Important Way that you Provide Training to Faculty, Staff or Students Who Manage Websites or Enter Content?, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #15-3: What is the Most Important Way that you Provide Training to Faculty, Staff or Students Who Manage Websites or Enter Content?, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #15-4: What is the Most Important Way that you Provide Training to Faculty, Staff or Students Who Manage Websites or Enter Content?, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #15-5: Who Provides Training?; Table #15-6: Who Provides Training?, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #15-7: Who Provides Training?, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #15-8: Who Provides Training?, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #15-9: Best Approach to Gain Cooperation from End Users with New Web Initiatives; Table #15-10: Best Approach to Gain Cooperation from End Users with New Web Initiatives, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #15-11: Best Approach to Gain Cooperation from End Users with New Web Initiatives, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #15-12: Best Approach to Gain Cooperation from End Users with New Web Initiatives, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment
SECTION #16: POLICIES ON ALLOWING FOR BLOGS AND OTHER VEHICLES FOR RANTS ON THE COLLEGE WEBSITE: Table #16-1: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Postings for Faculty/Academic Research; Table #16-2: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Postings for Faculty/Academic Research, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #16-3: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Postings for Faculty/Academic Research, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #16-4: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Postings for Faculty/Academic Research, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #16-5: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Postings for Faculty & Staff Blogs; Table #16-6: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Postings for Faculty & Staff Blogs, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #16-7: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Postings for Faculty & Staff Blogs, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #16-8: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Postings for Faculty & Staff Blogs, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #16-9: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Postings for Student Organizations & Projects; Table #16-10: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Postings for Student Organizations & Projects, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #16-11: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Postings for Student Organizations & Projects, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #16-12: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Postings for Student Organizations & Projects, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #16-13: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Postings for Student Blogs; Table #16-14: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Postings for Student Blogs, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #16-15: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Postings for Student Blogs, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #16-16: Percentage of Colleges that Allow Postings for Student Blogs, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #16-17: Percentage of Colleges that Provide a Program for Individual Postings and Blogs; Table #16-18: Percentage of Colleges that Provide a Program for Individual Postings and Blogs, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #16-19: Percentage of Colleges that Provide a Program for Individual Postings and Blogs, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #16-20: Percentage of Colleges that Provide a Program for Individual Postings and Blogs, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #16-21: Blog Program Provided by those College Web Staffs that Provide Such a Program to Patrons; Table #16-22: Blog Program Provided by those College Web Staffs that Provide Such a Program to Patrons, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #16-23: Blog Program Provided by those College Web Staffs that Provide Such a Program to Patrons, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #16-24: Blog Program Provided by those College Web Staffs that Provide Such a Program to Patrons, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment
SECTION #17: USE OF SOCIAL NETWORKING AND OTHER MASS MARKET WEB SITES: Table #17-1: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used iTunes for the College Website; Table #17-2: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used iTunes for the College Website, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #17-3: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used iTunes for the College Website, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #17-4: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used iTunes for the College Website, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #17-5: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used Facebook for the College Website; Table #17-6: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used Facebook for the College Website, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #17-7: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used Facebook for the College Website, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #17-8: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used Facebook for the College Website, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #17-9: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used MySpace for the College Website; Table #17-10: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used MySpace for the College Website; Table #17-11: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used MySpace for the College Website, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #17-12: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used MySpace for the College Website, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #17-13: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used MySpace for the College Website, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #17-14: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used Second Life for the College Website; Table #17-15: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used Second Life for the College Website, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #17-16: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used Second Life for the College Website, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #17-17: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used Second Life for the College Website, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #17-18: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used YouTube for the College Website; Table #17-19: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used YouTube for the College Website; Table #17-20: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used YouTube for the College Website, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #17-21: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used YouTube for the College Website, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #17-22: Percentage of Webmasters who have Linked to or Otherwise Used YouTube for the College Website, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #17-23: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using iTunes for the College Website; Table #17-24: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using iTunes for the College Website, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #17-25: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using iTunes for the College Website, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #17-26: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using iTunes for the College Website, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #17-27: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using Facebook for the College Website; Table #17-28: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using Facebook for the College Website, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #17-29: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using Facebook for the College Website, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #17-30: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using Facebook for the College Website, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #17-31: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using MySpace for the College Website; Table #17-32: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using MySpace for the College Website; Table #17-33: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using MySpace for the College Website, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #17-34: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using MySpace for the College Website, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #17-35: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using MySpace for the College Website, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #17-36: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using Second Life for the College Website; Table #17-37: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using Second Life for the College Website, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #17-38: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using Second Life for the College Website, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #17-39: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using Second Life for the College Website, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #17-40: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using YouTube for the College Website; Table #17-41: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using YouTube for the College Website, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #17-42: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using YouTube for the College Website, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #17-43: Percentage of Webmasters who are Considering Linking to or Otherwise Using YouTube for the College Website, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment
SECTION #18: USE OF WEBSITE ANALYTICS PACKAGES: Table #18-1: Can you Easily Obtain from Your Analytics Package Data on Most and Least Visited Pages?; Table #18-2: Can you Easily Obtain from Your Analytics Package Data on Most and Least Visited Pages?, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #18-3: Can you Easily Obtain from Your Analytics Package Data on Most and Least Visited Pages?, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #18-4: Can you Easily Obtain from Your Analytics Package Data on Most and Least Visited Pages?, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #18-5: Can you Easily Obtain from Your Analytics Package Data on Unique Visits to All Pages?; Table #18-6: Can you Easily Obtain from Your Analytics Package Data on Unique Visits to All Pages?, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #18-7: Can you Easily Obtain from Your Analytics Package Data on Unique Visits to All Pages?, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #18-8: Can you Easily Obtain from Your Analytics Package Data on Unique Visits to All Pages?, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #18-9: Can you Easily Obtain from Your Analytics Package Data on Total Visits to All Pages?; Table #18-10: Can you Easily Obtain from Your Analytics Package Data on Total Visits to All Pages?, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #18-11: Can you Easily Obtain from Your Analytics Package Data on Total Visits to All Pages?, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #18-12: Can you Easily Obtain from Your Analytics Package Data on Total Visits to All Pages?, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #18-13: Can you Easily Obtain from Your Analytics Package Data on Google and other Search Engine Key Words?; Table #18-14: Can you Easily Obtain from Your Analytics Package Data on Google and other Search Engine Key Words?, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #18-15: Can you Easily Obtain from Your Analytics Package Data on Google and other Search Engine Key Words?, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #18-16: Can you Easily Obtain from Your Analytics Package Data on Google and other Search Engine Key Words?, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #18-17: Would you like to Acquire the Ability to Track Visitors to All Pages?; Table #18-18: Would you like to Acquire the Ability to Track Visitors to All Pages?, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #18-19: Would you like to Acquire the Ability to Track Visitors to All Pages?, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #18-20: Would you like to Acquire the Ability to Track Website Use Groups? (i.e., students, alumni, faculty, etc); Table #18-21: Would you like to Acquire the Ability to Track Website Use Groups? (i.e., students, alumni, faculty, etc), Broken Out by Type of College; Table #18-22: Would you like to Acquire the Ability to Track Website Use Groups? (i.e., students, alumni, faculty, etc), Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #18-23: Would you like to Acquire the Ability to Distinguish Between Unique and Total Visitors?; Table #18-24: Would you like to Acquire the Ability to Distinguish Between Unique and Total Visitors?, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #18-25: Would you like to Acquire the Ability to Distinguish Between Unique and Total Visitors?, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #18-26: Would you like to Acquire the Ability to Obtain Search Engine Key Words?; Table #18-27: Would you like to Acquire the Ability to Obtain Search Engine Key Words?, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #18-28: Would you like to Acquire the Ability to Obtain Search Engine Key Words?, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #18-29: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Visitors Outside the College; Table #18-30: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Visitors Outside the College, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #18-31: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Visitors Outside the College, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #18-32: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Visitors Inside the College; Table #18-33: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Visitors Inside the College, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #18-34: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Visitors Inside the College, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #18-35: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Alumni; Table #18-36: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Alumni, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #18-37: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Alumni, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #18-38: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Inquirers About Admissions; Table #18-39: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Inquirers About Admissions, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #18-40: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Inquirers About Admissions, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #18-41: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Faculty; Table #18-42: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Faculty, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #18-43: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Faculty, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #18-44: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Students of the College; Table #18-45: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Students of the College, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #18-46: Percentage of Colleges that Can Make a Pretty Good Estimate of Website Traffic from Students of the College, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment
SECTION #19: SERVER PLATFORMS & OPERATING LANGUAGES: Table #19-1: The Primary Program Used for the Server Platform; Table #19-2: The Primary Program Used for the Server Platform, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #19-3: The Primary Program Used for the Server Platform, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #19-4: What is the Primary Operating System?; Table #19-5: What is the Primary Operating System?, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #19-6: What is the Primary Operating System?, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #19-7: What is the Primary Operating System?, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment
SECTION #20: SUPPORT FOR VARIOUS SCRIPTING LANGUAGES: Table #20-1: Percentage of Websites that Support Drupal as a Scripting Language; Table #20-2: Percentage of Websites that Support Drupal as a Scripting Language, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #20-3: Percentage of Websites that Support Drupal as a Scripting Language, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #20-4: Percentage of Websites that Support Drupal as a Scripting Language, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #20-5: Percentage of Websites that Support MS ACCESS as a Scripting Language; Table #20-6: Percentage of Websites that Support MS ACCESS as a Scripting Language, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #20-7: Percentage of Websites that Support MS ACCESS as a Scripting Language, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #20-8: Percentage of Websites that Support MS ACCESS as a Scripting Language, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #20-9: Percentage of Websites that Support MS SSQL as a Scripting Language; Table #20-10: Percentage of Websites that Support MS SSQL as a Scripting Language, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #20-11: Percentage of Websites that Support MS SSQL as a Scripting Language, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #20-12: Percentage of Websites that Support MS SSQL as a Scripting Language, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #20-13: Percentage of Websites that Support MYSQL as a Scripting Language; Table #20-14: Percentage of Websites that Support MYSQL as a Scripting Language, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #20-15: Percentage of Websites that Support MYSQL as a Scripting Language, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #20-16: Percentage of Websites that Support MYSQL as a Scripting Language, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #20-17: Percentage of Websites that Support ORACLE as a Scripting Language; Table #20-18: Percentage of Websites that Support ORACLE as a Scripting Language, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #20-19: Percentage of Websites that Support ORACLE as a Scripting Language, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #20-20: Percentage of Websites that Support ORACLE as a Scripting Language, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #20-21: Percentage of Websites that Support PERL as a Scripting Language; Table #20-22: Percentage of Websites that Support PERL as a Scripting Language, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #20-23: Percentage of Websites that Support PERL as a Scripting Language, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #20-24: Percentage of Websites that Support PERL as a Scripting Language, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #20-25: Percentage of Websites that Support PHP as a Scripting Language; Table #20-26: Percentage of Websites that Support PHP as a Scripting Language, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #20-27: Percentage of Websites that Support PHP as a Scripting Language, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #20-28: Percentage of Websites that Support PHP as a Scripting Language, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment
SECTION #21: USE OF PORTAL & WEB DEVELOPMENT SOFTWARE/APPLICATIONS: Table #21-1: Percentage of Websites that Use the Following Types of Portal Software; Table #21-2: Percentage of Websites Using Any Software Cited Below that Use the Following Specific Web Development Tools; Table #21-3: Percentage of Websites Using Any Software Cited Below that Use the Following Specific Web Development Tools; Table #21-4: Percentage of Websites Using Any Software Cited Below that Use the Following Specific Web Development Tools, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #21-5: Percentage of Websites Using any Software Cited Below that Use the Following Specific Web Development Tools, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #21-6: Percentage of Colleges that Use the Following Web Analytics Packages
SECTION #22: DISASTER RECOVERY PLANS
SECTION #23: USE OF PERSONAL COMPUTERS & WORKSTATIONS BY THE COLLEGE WEBSITE STAFF: Table #23-1: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Apple as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations; Table #23-2: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Apple as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #23-3: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Apple as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #23-4: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Apple as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #23-5: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Dell as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations; Table #23-6: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Dell as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #23-7: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Dell as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #23-8: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Dell as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #23-9: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Gateway as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations; Table #23-10: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Gateway as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #23-11: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Gateway as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #23-12: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Gateway as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #23-13: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Hewlett Packard as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations; Table #23-14: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Hewlett Packard as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #23-15: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Hewlett Packard as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #23-16: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Hewlett Packard as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #23-17: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use IBM as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations; Table #23-18: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use IBM as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #23-19: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use IBM as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #23-20: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use IBM as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #23-21: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Sun Solaris as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations; Table #23-22: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Sun Solaris as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #23-23: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Sun Solaris as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #23-24: Percentage of Web Staffs that Use Sun Solaris as a Main Supplier of Personal Computers & Workstations, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment
SECTION #24: ROLE OF THE WEBSITE IN CAMPUS CRISIS COMMUNICATIONS STRATEGY: Table #24-1: Percentage of Institutions that have a Strategy to Provide Crisis Communications to Students, Staff and Faculty Through Mass Email Broadcast; Table #24-2: Percentage of Institutions that have a Strategy to Provide Crisis Communications to Students, Staff and Faculty Through Mass Email Broadcast, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #24-3: Percentage of Institutions that have a Strategy to Provide Crisis Communications to Students, Staff and Faculty Through Mass Email Broadcast, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #24-4: Percentage of Institutions that have a Strategy to Provide Crisis Communications to Students, Staff and Faculty Through Mass Email Broadcast, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #24-5: Percentage of Institutions that have a Strategy to Provide Crisis Communications to Students, Staff and Faculty Through an Emergency Page on the College Website; Table #24-6: Percentage of Institutions that have a Strategy to Provide Crisis Communications to Students, Staff and Faculty Through an Emergency Page on the College Website, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table #24-7: Percentage of Institutions that have a Strategy to Provide Crisis Communications to Students, Staff and Faculty Through an Emergency Page on the College Website, Broken Out by Type of College; Table #24-8: Provide Crisis Communications to Students, Staff and Faculty Through Text Messaging to Cell Phones, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment; Table #24-9: Percentage of Institutions that have a Strategy to Provide Crisis Communications to Students, Staff and Faculty Through Text Messaging to Cell Phones; Table 24-10: Percentage of Institutions that have a Strategy to Provide Crisis Communications to Students, Staff and Faculty Through Text Messaging to Cell Phones, Broken Out for Public and Private Colleges; Table 24-11: Percentage of Institutions that have a Strategy to Provide Crisis Communications to Students, Staff and Faculty Through Text Messaging to Cell Phones, Broken Out by Type of College; Table 24-12: Provide Crisis Communications to Students, Staff and Faculty Through Text Messaging to Cell Phones, Broken Out by Level of Full Time Equivalent Enrollment
OTHER REPORTS OF INTEREST FROM PRIMARY RESEARCH GROUP

	Research Index \| Publishers \| My Account \| Contact Us \| About MindBranch
	Welcome Guest (Login/Register) \| 0 items