Tying Home Automation & Security to Home Networks in NA: Renters Willing to Pay More for Remote Access

Published Date: August 2007 Published By: In-Stat Page Count: 85 Order Code: R97-2936 $3,495.00   PDF E-mail From Publisher $6,990.00   Global Site License Fulfilled by Publisher   Questions About This Report E-mail a Colleague Printable Page Fax Your Order Description Table of Contents Similar Products Executive Summary Introduction Survey Demographics Gender Household Income Age Region Internet Access Residence Owners vs. Renters Number of Rooms per Residence Age of Owned Homes Home Security Service Subscribership Security Service Subscribership How Many Households are Subscribing? Security Service Subscribers by Age Group Non-Subscriber Interest in Obtaining Security Service Current Use of Home Automation Devices & Systems Current Use by General Category Device/System Ownership by US Region Device/System Ownership by Age Average Number of Rooms per Household by Device/System Ownership Simple Timers Popular Applications Satisfaction Reasons for Lack of Satisfaction with Simple Timers Standalone Automation Systems Popular Applications Satisfaction Reasons for Lack of Satisfaction with Standalone Automation System Automation System Connected to Home Network Popular Applications Satisfaction Reasons for Lack of Satisfaction with Automation System Connected to Home Network Self-Installed vs. Professionally-Installed Automation Systems Standalone Systems Systems Connected to Home Network Decision Criteria for Self vs. Professional Installation Popular Type of Communications Communications Being Used by Standalone Systems Communications Being Used by Automation Systems Connected to Home Networks Automation System Users: Monitoring & Controlling the Home Front Remotely Current Ability to Remotely Access Methods Being Used to Remotely Access Automation Systems Importance of Monitoring vs. Controlling Remotely Willingness to Pay Fee to Service Provider for Remote Access for Automation Cost Sensitivity for Remote Access Overall Consumer Interest in Remotely Monitoring & Controlling the Home General Interest in Monitoring Home While Away by Internet General Consumer Interest in Monitoring/Controlling Home Automation Applications Remotely Controlling Lights Controlling Heating or Cooling Systems Controlling a Security System Notifications of a Security Alert Monitoring Electrical Use Controlling Sprinkler Systems Monitoring Home via Security Camera Applications in the Most Demand Applications Currently Being Accessed Remotely by Automation System Users Willingness to Pay Monthly Fee for Remote Access Systems to Control Heating & Cooling Current Automation Systems Enabling Control Programmable Thermostat Automation System Brands or Technologies Currently Owned Power Consumption Management Power Load Management System & Plan: Current Use Interest in Power Load Management Plan Power Load Users: Interest in Power Consumption Proactive Monitoring Demand for Pre-Installed Wiring in New Homes Interest Price Willing to Pay European Consumer Surveys Ownership of Home Automation System Remote Access North American Forecasts Selected Vendors AT&T Bell Canada Control4 Crestron D-Link Exceptional Innovations GE Security iControl Networks Intermatic Linksys NextAlarm.com SmartLabs Universal Devices Visonic Zensys Methodology Related In-Stat Reports List of Tables Table 1. Type of Device/System Owned by US Region Table 2. Type of Device/System Owned by Age Group Table 3. Fee Willing to Pay for Remote Access by Application vs. Subsets of Respondents by System Ownership, Own/Rent Home, Have Security Service, Interested in Power Load Plan Table 4. Automation System Brands or Technologies Currently Owned: Standalone System vs. System Connected to PC Network Table 5. North American Households, Households with Automation System, Households with Remote Access to Automation System & Service Revenue for Remote Access to Home Automation (Households in Thousands, Revenue in US$M) Table 6. North American Households with Automation System, Number of Systems in Use & Home Automation Systems Connected to PC Home Network (Households in Thousands) List of Figures Figure 1. Participants’ Gender by Survey Figure 2. Participants’ Household Income Figure 3. Home Automation/Security Survey Participants by Age Group Figure 4. US Participants by Region Figure 5. Participants by Internet Access at Home: Dial-up, Broadband, and No Access Figure 6. Own vs. Rent Residence Figure 7. Number of Rooms per Residence Figure 8. Age of Home Figure 9. Subscribers vs. Non-Subscribers of Home Security Service: Home Automation/Security Survey Figure 10. Subscribers vs. Non-Subscribers of Home Security Service: RTS Web Survey Figure 11. Subscribers vs. Non-Subscribers of Home Security Service: RTS Telephone Survey Figure 12. Security Service Subscribers by Age Group: Home Automation/Security Survey vs. All Respondents Figure 13. Security Service Subscribers by Age Group: RTS Phone vs. RTS Web Surveys with Age Comparisons for All Respondents Figure 14. Non-Subscriber Interest in Obtaining Security Service: Home Automation/Security Survey Figure 15. Non-Subscriber Interest in Obtaining Security Service: RTS Web Survey Figure 16. Non-Subscriber Interest in Obtaining Security Service: RTS Phone Survey Figure 17. Current Use of Home Automation Device/System by Category Figure 18. Average Number of Rooms per Household by Device/System Ownership Figure 19. Simple Timer Use by Type of Device Controlled Figure 20. Satisfaction with Simple Timers Figure 21. Reason for Lack of Satisfaction with Simple Timers Figure 22. Standalone Automation System Use by Type of Device Controlled Figure 23. Satisfaction with Standalone Automation System Figure 24. Reason for Lack of Satisfaction with Standalone Automation System Figure 25. Automation System Connected to Home Network Use by Type of Device Controlled Figure 26. Satisfaction with Automation System Connected to Home Network Figure 27. Reason for Lack of Satisfaction with Automation System Connected to Home Network Figure 28. Installation of Standalone Systems Figure 29. Installation of Automation System Connected to Home Network Figure 30. Decision Criteria for Self vs. Professional Installation by Type of System Figure 31. Standalone System Methods of Communicating/Controlling Figure 32. Home Network-Connected Methods of Communicating/Controlling Figure 33. Current Ability to Remotely Access Automation Systems Figure 34. Automation System Remote Access by Method: PC vs. Mobile Phone, or Both Figure 35. Importance of Automation System Users to Remotely Monitor Functions Figure 36. Importance of Automation System Users to Remotely Control Functions Figure 37. Willingness to Pay Fee to Service Provider for Automation Remote Access Figure 38. How Much Users are Willing to Pay for Remote Access Figure 39. General Interest of All Respondents in Monitoring Home or Household Occupants Remotely by Internet Figure 40. Interest in Control of Lighting Figure 41. Interest in Control of Heating or Cooling Systems Figure 42. Interest in Control of a Security System Figure 43. Interest in Security Alerts Figure 44. Interest in Monitoring Electrical Use Figure 45. Interest in Control of Sprinkler Systems Figure 46. Interest in Monitoring Home via Security Camera Figure 47. Remote Applications in Demand Figure 48. Remote Applications Currently Being Used Figure 49. Control of Heating & Cooling by Automation Systems Figure 50. Programmable Thermostat Ownership Figure 51. Power Load Management Plan Use Figure 52. Interest in Power Load Management Plan Figure 53. Interest in Proactive Monitoring of Power Consumption Figure 54. Interest in New Home Pre-Installed Wiring: Computer Networking vs. Audio/Video Distribution vs. Home Automation Systems Figure 55. Price Willing to Pay for New Home Pre-Installed Wiring Figure 56. Ownership of Home Automation System: France, Germany, & UK Households Figure 57. Remote Access to Home Automation: France, Germany, & UK Households Similar Products • Glass and Fiber Optic Manufacturing Published Nov 2008 by First Research, Inc. • Fiber Optic Cable Manufacturing Industry in the U.S. and its Foreign Trade Published Nov 2008 by Supplier Relations US, LLC • Parallel optics on the move Published Oct 2008 by Ovum Plc • 2008 Africa - Telecoms, Mobile and Broadband in Southern Region and Indian Ocean Islands Published Oct 2008 by Paul Budde Communication Pty Ltd • Cable, Internet & Telephone Providers in the US - Industry Risk Rating Report Published Oct 2008 by IBISWorld • Will The Internet Break? ISP economics assessment to 2012 Published Oct 2008 by Screen Digest • 2008 Global Telecoms - Key Trends and Statistics Published Oct 2008 by Paul Budde Communication Pty Ltd • Everything Old is New Again,Even in the Fiber Market Published Oct 2008 by Yankee Group • Cables in Japan Published Oct 2008 by Datamonitor • The 2009 World Market Forecasts for Imported Optical Fiber Cables Published Oct 2008 by Icon Group International, Inc.